User talk:Pharmfdainfo

January 2023
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 17:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * I suppose you don’t want “Your proposed new“ as part of the username? Tropicalkitty (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * What is your association with the website you linked to? 331dot (talk) 22:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * HI,
 * That website is mine. I write articles on pharmaceutical subjects. Pharmfdainfo (talk) 14:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * You won't be allowed to include links to your website. Blogs are not reliable sources because they are by definition self-published sources with no editorial review. We only accept content that is cited to sources with an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight (major news organizations, academic press, reputable publishers of books/magazines/newspapers). --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * With that in mind, what specifically do you intend to edit, if unblocked? SQL Query Me!  20:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)