User talk:Phatmaddness909

Welcome!
Hello, Phatmaddness909, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page MC Trouble have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. NZFC (talk) 20:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...an item you removed on the page for MC Trouble. I don't know how to submit audio proof on here, but if you look up "You Got Me Cryin'" and "The Saga Continues..." by The Boys, and listen to these songs, it is without a doubt that they dedicated either a part of that song or the whole song to MC Trouble. If there are any other guidelines I didn't meet with my submission, please advise me of them and I'll do better next time.

Phatmaddness909 (talk) 19:53, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia cotnent must be a summary of what reliable published sources have reported about a subject. "Listen to the song and draw your own conclusions" would be original research, something Wikipedia explicitly does not accept. Personally I also wonder whether those dedicated songs are really that important to our readers' understanding of MC Trouble. Huon (talk) 21:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with... "Wikipedia cotnent must be a summary of what reliable published sources have reported about a subject. "Listen to the song and draw your own conclusions" would be original research, something Wikipedia explicitly does not accept. Personally I also wonder whether those dedicated songs are really that important to our readers' understanding of MC Trouble. Huon (talk) 21:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)"

First, I personally do not care about what you wonder when it comes to dedicated tracks in general, let alone about any one individual. If ATCQ's mentioning is no different than The Boys', then neither one would be there if it were up to you. Second, the word is CONTENT, not cotnent. Third, and this is why Wikipedia continues to be the LEAST reliable source and is NOT viable for college-level dissertations and research papers the universe over, if you can't accept original research, even if it IS a summary based on a RELIABLE PUBLISHED SOURCE (like, oh, I don't know, say, a SONG included on an INDUSTRY-RECOGNIZED RELEASE), why even exist? Where was the verification for the ATCQ dedication? That was a summary of what a reliable published source reported/mentioned about a subject. HEL-lo!?!

Phatmaddness909 (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pointing out my typo. And you're entirely right, there's no better reason to have the unreferenced ATCQ mention than the unreferenced The Boys mention, so I have removed that, too. Huon (talk) 18:21, 17 March 2018 (UTC)