User talk:Phatnblak

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. —  Σ xplicit  01:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello. I was the editor on all 8 seasons of "Girlfriends".  Evan Ross appeared, uncredited, in episode 171.  He plays a record producer, and has multiple lines of  dialogue.  I am not sure how you want me to verify this; I just checked youtube and only the very end of the episode (a scene with Crissette Michelle and Persia White) is posted.  Season 8 isn't on DVD yet, so I cannot grab a screen shot.   I am not sure what I can do other than say that I was the editor and he was in the show. Phatnblak (talk) 02:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Found a page from the New York Times. He was uncredited on screen, but the Times apparently knew he was on because they list him in the episode.  Here is the link: http://tv.nytimes.com/episode/71769/Girlfriends/overview  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phatnblak (talk • contribs) 02:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for responding. In the future, please add any additional comments to the section you've created on a talk page; there's no need for an additional section when on the same topic. I'll go ahead and add part of what you originally instated into the article. As far as him playing a record producer, that will have to stay out of the article until it can be verified. Regards. —  Σ xplicit  03:05, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Craftsman Mansion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craftsman Mansion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Craftsman Mansion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MelanieN (talk) 16:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School, Phatnblak!

Wikipedia editor Tompw just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Better late than never - looking good!"

To reply, leave a comment on Tompw's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.


 * Regarding your post... My review was one which was supposed to be done when the page was created - I've been clearing the backlog on that process. What I check for with that is that the page is something sensible, and has been tagged with any major issues (e.g. lack of citations). The process also the place to flag anything blatently non-notable. At first glance, this article was of intermediate notability, so there was no need to flag it as part of page curation. Now, clearly other people then came along, and that led to it being examined more closely and deleted. Kind of a shame, given all the work that's gone it. Hope that helps, and you don't get discouraged - keep up the good work! Tom pw (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2016 (UTC)