User talk:Phattcityusa

As is the case in countless other articles on Wikipedia, giving information as to an individuals origins upon the initial mentioning of an individual gives a more clear identification of the individual for readers who may not be interested in reading the entire article. It is not vandalism, and should remain as edited.````Phattcityusa

July 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Twitter. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 20:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked 24 hours for edit warring and sock puppetry. (blocked by –MuZemike 00:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You clearly used the User:Showmenights account to continue in an edit war on the Twitter article. You were warned above not to edit war, but instead you continue to do so instead of engage in any sort of civil discussion. Regards, –MuZemike 00:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Tb hotch Ta lk C. 00:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)