User talk:Phdoc0

Vandalizing pages will get you banned from WikiPedia. Even when you create a new account, it will result in your IP getting banned. If you want to be a member of the WikiPedia community, great! However, it looks like you aren't here for productive reasons. I will be reporting you... again. Elementrider77 (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC) ElementRider77

m.o.p 06:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

If you are contesting a block as a sockpuppet, about the only valid reasons I can think of would include denying that you are a sock and providing us with some convincing explanation for the mistake, or admitting that the two accounts are both yours but providing some justification for your use of them being legitimate. If you wish to present some other reason why you should be unblocked, you would need to do so on your original account - but even there, using an unblock request to attack/blame other people is unlikely to succeed -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

If that is your argument, you will need to make your request at your main account, at User talk:Ground101. Unblock requests at sockpuppet accounts are very unlikely to be successful unless they address the actual sockpuppetry issue - so at the very least you would need to address the relationship between the accounts of User:Phdoc0 and User:Ground101 -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Being an admin does not give me the ability to check IP addresses, so I am not able to do that. Only specially selected people with Checkuser privilege can do that, so now that you have actually addressed the sockpuppetry charge we will have to leave it until someone comes along who is able to check -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I am a CheckUser, and have confirmed that you are ❌ to Ground101, based on technical evidence, that is. However, I am curious as to why your very first edit here was to restore the content Ground101 was adding, when it was obviously being contested by another editor. Were you contacted by someone to make this edit? Hers fold  (t/a/c) 20:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Just as a response to Daniel Case's unblock decline above, is it possible for a CheckUser to expand at all and perhaps say how confident we can be about the two users being unconnected? Do they geolocate differently, for example? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, when I say two users are unrelated, I take the whole "using a different computer" thing into account. These users are several hundred miles apart and cannot be the same person. However, that does not necessarily exclude meatpuppetry, hence my question. I won't undo Daniel's decline, but I would encourage Phdoc0 to post another request, addressing the concern I raised. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 17:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I would, had I Checkuser access, say two accounts are unrelated if they are a great distance apart and there are no other clear similarities and the technical evidence doesn't suggest a match and the other IP is not known to be a proxy. Mere geographic separation does not distinguish different users, after all ... I have blocked vandals who were clearly students at a US high school whose IPs geolocated to Europe or Asia, after all. Daniel Case (talk) 18:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Good for you. I focus on the technical evidence when speaking as a checkuser. In this case, both accounts are a great distance apart, use computers with different operating systems, and do not appear to be using proxies. As I said, they are technically unrelated and cannot be the same person. Now excuse me while I block that IP address below for block evasion... Hers fold  (t/a/c) 14:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Please address the content dispute issues 71.244.30.84 (talk) 19:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC)ground101