User talk:Phg64

Richard Lynn
Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante.

In addition, Wikipedia does not accept the unsourced personal opinions of its editors as article content. If you continue to add this unsourced material, you can be blocked from future editing. Please stop attempting to add this material. If you believe this material is germane, please provide a source for every statement you wish to add, otherwise your material will continue to be removed from the article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Richard Lynn, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Richard Lynn‎. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 12:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your 2nd personal attack
I notice that you told someone their response "sounds like ideological terrorism" and that " It shows that you feel fundamentally uncomfortable with your faulty ideas based on your preconceived dogmas that Lynn must be criticised." Please read WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL. If you continue to use talk pages to attack editors you may find yourself blocked from editing. Such attacks can have a chilling effect. Doug Weller talk 13:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)