User talk:PhilMPD

MfD nomination of Draft:Father Tomás Carbonell
Draft:Father Tomás Carbonell, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Father Tomás Carbonell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Father Tomás Carbonell during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 10:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomás Carbonell (friar) has been accepted
 Tomás Carbonell (friar), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Tom%C3%A1s_Carbonell_(friar) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of Tomás Carbonell (friar) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomás Carbonell (friar) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tomás Carbonell (friar) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * This is just a procedural nomination, by the way, since ReeceTheHawk had already (unusually) nominated your draft for deletion. I think it is a fine addition to the encyclopaedia and hope you will continue editing. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)