User talk:Philafrenzy/Archive 19

DYK nomination of Frank J. Canova
Hello! Your submission of Frank J. Canova at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Basil Goulandris
Hello! Your submission of Basil Goulandris at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Tony Rudd (stockbroker)
Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of David Berguer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Berguer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Berguer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 08:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grade II* listed pubs


A tag has been placed on Category:Grade II* listed pubs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T 16:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Pauline Smith (artist)
IronGargoyle (talk) 00:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

editing encyclopedic
Hi, can you point me to the wikipedia shortcut that governs editors on what is encyclopedic please.Hmcst1 (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Five pillars. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:47, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Frank J. Canova
Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Nairn Transport Co route map.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nairn Transport Co route map.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Basil Goulandris
Alex ShihTalk 00:42, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for R. W. Symonds
Alex ShihTalk 12:29, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Town magazine covers 1960s.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Town magazine covers 1960s.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Changed to single images from montage. FUR rationale fixed to point to the right article. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Town magazine covers 1967.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Town magazine covers 1967.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Changed to single images from montage. FUR rationale fixed to point to the right article. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Norah C. James
Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of CWM FX for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CWM FX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CWM FX until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S Philbrick (Talk)  16:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Incident at Clovelly Cottage
Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Anita Halpin
Hello! Your submission of Anita Halpin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hawkeye7  (talk)  06:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of West Sussex Record Office


The article West Sussex Record Office has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability for this record office. I do know that the 'Sussex Declaration' (copy of the Declaration of Independence) was found there; but the notability is of the Sussex Declaration, not the record office; and is already well-covered at Physical history of the United States Declaration of Independence."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 04:49, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Wyndham Lathem for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wyndham Lathem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wyndham Lathem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anmccaff (talk) 23:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Dante Society of America for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dante Society of America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dante Society of America until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 06:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

A. E. Sewell
You could have just reverted the last edit. I have no restored the new detail. However, it does still seem a bit drab having all those images directly below each other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.202.98 (talk) 22:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree the article needs work, particularly the images but left/right is not the answer. Are you using mobile view? For BMD have you tried familysearch.org rather than FMP? Philafrenzy (talk) 22:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Anita Halpin
Philafrenzy, do you plan to make the necessary expansion to this article so it meets the 5x expansion requirement, or should I mark it for closure? It's been a week since you were pinged. Please respond on the nomination right away. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:19, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rich Piana (bodybuilder)


A tag has been placed on Rich Piana (bodybuilder), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 14:17, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Town magazine covers 1960s.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Town magazine covers 1960s.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Also:
 * File:Town magazine covers 1967.jpg

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Amy Burvall
Wikipedian,

I noticed you reverted punctuation and spelling to the British format, but Ms. Burvall appears to be American, and that's why we're using American syntax and spelling on that page. If you have other reasons for doing it, please use that article's talk page to explain and collaborate with other editors. Further reversions without discussions there could be construed disruptive editing. I'm assuming good faith and doubting that's your intent. Thanks mate. 209.117.61.226 (talk) 11:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * It was the reordering of the sentences I changed back. I am quite happy to use American dates etc. Philafrenzy (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Lush
You can't just take something out and call it "non notable". If we were talking about Lush Building, Oxford Street, sure, that's non-notable (and why we don't have an article on it), but in this instance it was added by an IP here and my general spider-senses told me that it was something the silent majority who don't normally edit WP might expect to find if they're looking in the article. Just my 2c. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * It's in "Notable buildings". My spider sense tells me its not a notable building and the IP, who only made one edit, worked for Lush! Philafrenzy (talk) 15:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * We should probably just change that section to "Properties". As to who made the original edit, it could just be somebody who bought something from there, and given the queue I found when I went in there Christmas shopping (good stocking fillers for female relatives), that's a whole bunch of people. I think also I was thinking about systemic bias a bit; shopping for fashionable personal hygiene artefacts isn't really something I think the stereotypical Wikipedian demographic do that much. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * We are not really a shopping guide and three floors isn't much in that street. I don't feel strongly about it but doubt the average cosmetics shopper would bother to add it. I changed it to buildings from properties. Also, listed buildings should really be immediately below that. Philafrenzy (talk) 15:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you . You have inspired me to expand it a bit more. More later. There's a lot of mileage (pun intended!) in these old London streets, even the ones that no longer exist. Perhaps particularly those. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd hate to say this so soon after complimenting your efforts, but can you try to use stub templates more specific than stub? Category:Stubs has gotten quite backlogged. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  01:48, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Sound advice. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:21, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Sound advice, yes. You don't have to follow it if you can't figure out stub sorting, or have another equally legitimate to not stub sort. That's what stub is for.
 * One of my pet peeves is when people use the page curation bar to get to the next page on Special:NewPagesFeed ASAP, backlogging Category:Stubs in the process. You don't appear to be rushing through anything, never mind NPP; given that, an occasional is okay. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @  02:57, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

WNM
We've noticed a big banner on Wikipedia homepage asking for donations. We are happy to donate, however we need your expertise to amend details of some article. Are you happy to do that for us? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidonors (talk • contribs) 09:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I assume this relates to World News Media. No I am not. We don't edit articles for money. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A. Alisaffi


The article A. Alisaffi has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't seem to exist. Sourcing not found at all."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sources are offline and given in the article:

Philafrenzy (talk) 06:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Tyler, Varro E. (1991) Philatelic Forgers: Their Lives and Works. Revised edn. Sidney, Ohio: Linn's Stamp News, Amos Press, pp. 2-3.
 * "Greece: The Alisaffi forgeries of the first type of head" by W.D. Beckton in Philatelic Journal of Great Britain, Vol. 35, 1925, p. 66.
 * "Alisaffi forgeries" by N.C. Ure in H.P.S. Bulletin, Hellenic Philatelic Society of Great Britain, No. 54, 1984, p. 22.

DYK nomination of Shirley Pitts
Hello! Your submission of Shirley Pitts at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 13:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * FYI, There is also a need to clarify at least a couple of points in this article. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 16:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

A. Alisaffi
I was unable to prove that any of the publications used in A. Alisaffi exist. Are you sure you didn't mistype an ISBN? I also get no results on Google that aren't from Wikipedia mirrors, and absolutely nothing on Google Books. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of A. Alisaffi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. Alisaffi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/A. Alisaffi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Email
I would like to send you an e-mail. I have something to discuss. Please email me. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 15:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Merja Makinen
Hello, I noticed you reverted my edits to Merja Makinen. I took a look back at my edit, and don't really understand why. The punctuation changes I made to the "selected publications" section are certainly unimportant (I didn't bother very hard to standardize that section anyway). However, the other changes I made were removing a red link to a nonexistent topic, correcting "twentieth century" (it doesn't take a hyphen in that usage), and removing the capital letters from a few parenthetical phrases which didn't need them. These are not terribly important corrections, but they are corrections, so I'm wondering why you didn't let them stand? Any light you can shed on this would be appreciated, as I am always trying to learn more here. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * This often happens when multiple changes are made in one edit, some valid, some not, some purely stylistic choices. It might be better to split this sort of thing up. The red link to feminist writing is not an error for instance, it's a probably valid topic (in my opinion) that doesn't exist yet. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Understood, thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 01:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Anita Halpin
Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Town magazine covers 1960s.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Town magazine covers 1960s.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Also:
 * File:Town magazine covers 1967.jpg

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thomas A. Bird.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Thomas A. Bird.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Oakwood
Stop disruptively reverting. You appear to be ignorant of some basic guidelines, even after I linked to them in my first edit summary. Kindly read up on WP:IG, and if you do not understand an edit, do not revert it. I do not appreciate people like you wasting my time like this. 95.145.130.78 (talk) 11:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * User now blocked and his edits reverted by someone else. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Sarah Ansari for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Ansari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sarah Ansari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rayman60 (talk) 19:39, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

A gentle reminder...
...that MoS is not mandatory. It is merely a guideline, and should not be edit warred over. Thus spake ArbCom. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It is nothing to do with the MOS as such, you appear to have misunderstood the purpose of the references section. It lists the sources and publications used in the body of the article. That is why including further reading inside references is a terrible idea, it confuses sources with non sources. This is not the idea of me or Wikipedia or the MOS, it is simply standard scholarly practice. A pity since the rest of the article looks good. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:06, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Shirley Pitts
— Maile (talk) 13:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Main page errors FYI. See also User talk:GRuban. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 16:46, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest
Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed updates to Pitney Bowes article
Hello, Philafrenzy. I see that you added a fair use photo of a Pitney Bowes machine to the Postage meter article, and your account name suggests an interest in stamps and postage-related things. You may or may not be interested, but I've proposed an expanded and updated Pitney Bowes article on behalf of the company, which has had quite a fascinating history! I've saved my draft in full here, and submitted an edit request at Talk:Pitney Bowes to update the infobox and add the proposed "Overview" section. Given my conflict of interest, I will not edit the article directly and seek uninvolved editors to review the draft for accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability. Is this something you might be willing to help with? Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 16:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It probably is a fascinating history but there is a limited amount of time I can spend on Wikipedia (contrary to appearances) and corporate histories aren't my favourite topics. Hopefully someone else will help you out. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:46, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem, and thanks for the quick reply. Inkian Jason (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Carolingians descended from Charles Martel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Carolingians descended from Charles Martel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Carolingians descended from Charles Martel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Agricolae (talk) 04:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Achilleas Kallakis
Hello! Your submission of Achilleas Kallakis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Skr15081997 (talk) 05:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Deletion review/Log/2017 October 11
You are invited to join the discussion at Deletion review/Log/2017 October 11. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Celebrity Mastermind Edit Dispute
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! BangJan1999 23:50, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, from a DR/N volunteer
This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. --  Dane talk  01:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK for John Potter (chemist)
Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Onesimus Ustonson
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Steven Marshall (Railtrack)
Could you please check the exact date of death again? At Deaths in August 2017 he is listed at August 28 while the article states September 28. Both are referenced with the obituary in The Telegraph but unfortunately I cannot access the whole press article. Both obviously cannot be right so either the statement in Steven Marshall (Railtrack) has to be corrected or he should be listed in Deaths in September 2017 at September 28. Thanks. --Proofreader (talk) 13:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I can't access the pages either and prepared the article from the obituary in The Times which was dated 14 October, so I am inclined to think that September is correct. Do you know who added it to August deaths? Philafrenzy (talk) 15:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Achilleas Kallakis
— Maile (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Kimmie Taylor
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Reginald Appleby
Hello! Your submission of Reginald Appleby at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cambalachero (talk) 18:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Book reviewers


A tag has been placed on Category:Book reviewers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T go beyond 21:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)