User talk:Philcha/Archives/2012/April

CITATION tools
Please can one of you to help me to the CITATION tools - there 2 sets. --Philcha (talk) 05:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * There's this, and there's also a gadget called ProveIt that you can switch on in your preferences. Is that the kind of thing you're looking for? Malleus Fatuorum 14:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I've saved magnus/makeref.php offline. Thanks, Malleus! --Philcha (talk) 16:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Help desk
Hi Pilcha! There is a very hard to decipher (to put it mildly) post at the above help desk post by an IP. The only thing I can make out from what is mentioned is that it seems to be related to edits you made to or regarding kimberella years ago. I though maybe, just possibly you would have some idea where we do not (and I also thought you might want to be informed of an edit seemingly related to you; I would were the roles reversed). Best regards.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Overhaul of nematode and tardigrade
Hello. I'm just wondering why, while the under construction tag is in place, you don't prepare the new versions in a sandbox. This way, a good copy will always be present for visitors.

Nematode and tardigrade gets 2k and 1k hits per day respectively. That's a lot of visitors seeing what looks like a first draft.

Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:20, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Tardigrades
Hello,

Let me start by saying that I am a huge fan of your work. Phylum are extremely intimidating articles to write and some of the most important, and I believe I have enjoyed reading a good deal of your work over the past couple of days. However, unless the tardigrade article is completely inaccurate, I feel that we should keep it in place until you are ready to completely post a revised and dramatically improved article. By taking it down to the bare bones, it does a disservice to those seeking information on tardigrades between the page being nearly blanked and when you post the improved version. When I've rewritten an article, I tend to use the sandbox to write the article in before bringing it live. Thank you, and I look forward to reading a revised tardigrade article. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 03:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The name User:Rufous-crowned Sparrow ? --Philcha (talk) 03:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Tardigrade is odd, and I move to Nemertea - and then Tardigrade, I hope. --Philcha (talk) 03:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Nematodes
Hi. I moved your most recent rewrite of the nematode article here in one of your sandboxes. It includes all of the wiki markup. Please let me know if I can help, and I look forward to reading your rewrite. Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 12:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)


 * OK ! ! ! ! ! --Philcha (talk) 15:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

RE: A nuesans (not you) everted Nematoda
Hi Philcha! I didn't quite understand your message - did you mean to say that an IP was able to edit your user page and you thought that it was semi-protected? It's not at the moment, but I can protect it for you if you'd like. The Helpful  One  20:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I have no problems. By the way, I've moved the Sandboxes to names that work better for me but still are at the front. --Philcha (talk) 21:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)