User talk:Philcha/Archives/2012/January

Orphaned non-free image File:Moo2ResearchMenu472.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Moo2ResearchMenu472.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Moo2RaceDesignMenu.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Moo2RaceDesignMenu.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

El Chico del Apartamento 512
Hey there :-) When will you review this article? Happy holidays, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  05:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I have left some comments. Best, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  04:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Philcha are you still reviewing this article? Talk:El Chico del Apartamento 512/GA1 shows your concern over some sources but not much review of the article's text. Meanwhile Good_article_nominations shows the article as not being reviewed and provides a link to Start review at GA2.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Apparently your review was declared abandoned on 4 January. A new review was started at Talk:El Chico del Apartamento 512/GA2 on 7 January by Czarkoff. If you have any additional concerns about the article you can added them to the second GAR. I may become involved there in about a week.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 10:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares
The article Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares for things which need to be addressed. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:18, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

WP Palaeontology in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Palaeontology for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares
The article Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:13, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The comments are given on the Talk:Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares/GA2 page. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 00:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

PvZ reception
Hi Philcha,

You've been doing a great job on the article on Plants vs. Zombies, but two times now you've moved the reception section up, before development. This isn't common in articles, reception and sales come last. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 19:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, User talk: Soetermans

Re Plants vs. Zombies, a lot of "Design" is about sales outlets, e.g. Azamon. --Philcha (talk) 02:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * You mean before I think? Because right now there isn't anything in the Design section about sales. But if there was a lot on sales, you should just cut and paste that into that particular section. --Soetermans. T / C 08:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * P.S. I'll check your talk page, otherwise leave me a talkback message (see Template: talkback).

Warcraft II
Hi Philcha. You may not have realised it, but the revisions you were making messed up the references (scroll to the bottom of this revision ). If you want to use sfn then that is fine, but it might be better to do it either all at once or in a sandbox first. AIR corn (talk) 03:16, 25 January 2012 (UTC)