User talk:Phildorocke

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Dear Phildorocke: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:


 * Introduction
 * Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Frequently Asked Questions
 * How do you edit a page?
 * How do you revert to a previous version of a page?
 * What about copyrights?
 * Community Portal

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes ( ~ ). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! –BuickCenturyDriver 22:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Scott Bourne. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There is still nothing in the source that indicates it refers to THIS Scott Bourne--until you can furnish such information, that information doesn't belong there. Blueboy96 20:09, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Let me say it again--there is nothing in the sourced material that indicates it refers to THIS Scott Bourne. Under our policy on biographies of living people, poorly sourced information about a living person--especially if it's controversial--doesn't belong in that article. Blueboy96 21:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

For information like that, it's not enough to provide the docket--you have to provide a link so that it can be verified. The standard here is not truth, but verifiability from a reliable source. Blueboy96 22:15, 13 August 2011 (UTC)