User talk:Phileasson

Welcome
Welcome!

hi hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! 22:39, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum
Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 19:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Invitation
Thanks! Sebastian scha. (talk) 18:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Happy First Day of Spring!
Happy First Day of Spring! Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring 2011!

If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Autumn not Spring then I wish you a happy First Day of Autumn 2011! To spread this message to others, add to there talk page with a friendly message.

Happy Halloween!
Cheers! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 05:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Wojciech Nawrocki
FYI, since you were involved in tagging it in the recent past. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 16:00, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to the December Wikification Drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:31, 2 December 2011 (UTC).

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Athletics at the 1972 Summer Olympics – Men's hammer throw, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Walter Schmidt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Muzhukkadhan
Hello Phileasson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Muzhukkadhan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not about a real person AFAICT so ineligible for A7. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 21:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Mr. Phileasson
This is the new article created by me named Muzhukkadhan. It is not related to any individual, or group of persons. It is completely related to a society of people of Tamilnadu who follows a traditional method of living. They belongs to the community called Kongu Vellalar. Muzhukkadhan is comining under this community. Kogu Vellalar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kongu_Vellalar List of Kongu Vellalar Kootams: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kongu_Vellalar_Kootams Maniyan Kootam: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maniyan_kootam

Similar to Maniyan Kootam I am creating page for Muzhukkadhan @ Muzhakka AaDhan Kindly allow me to go further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drthiruna (talk • contribs) 07:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Juliane Robra
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Juliane Robra, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.julianerobra.ch.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: July Newsletter and August Drive

 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:30, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification
Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the wikify template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify

Getting Wikimedians to the Olympic Games
Hi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 04:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hi! I'm working on NPP this morning and you are creating many articles that don't need attention from patrollers. Would you mind dropping by WP: PERM/AP to request the Autopatrolled flag to make it easier on New Page Patrollers? Thanks, Electric Catfish 13:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Thanks for the advice. I've just added a request to as you proposed. All the best! --Phileasson (talk) 14:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter
Hey. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Charles vs Karl
I've redirected Charles to Karl. If it's a plausible search term (and this version is mentioned in the lead), then just redirect rather than CSD. Redirects are cheap, and very useful if relevant. Peridon (talk) 19:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Wannée Kookbook
Hello Phileasson, You put a ref/note tag on [Wannée Kookboek]]. I don't understand the problem? Everything can be found back in the two short articles mentioned below on the page. Kind regards, Berkh (talk) 13:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * see talk user Berkh
 * Hello Phileasson, Thank you for your explanation. I searched for English articles. In vain. Only recipes and second hand editions. Dutch articles are hard to find to. The article of the Koninklijke Bibliotheek, or the Dutch Library of Congress, is by far the best I could find. Dutch cookbooks are hidden cultural heritage. I hope it is okay now. BTW tags should be more informative. It is not the first time. A picture of the Nieuwe Haagse Kookboek was removed recently because of copyright violations without any explanation in the tag. Finally it proved to be that the authors of the book were not 75 years years dead already. These kind of puzzles out of laziness costs unneccessary time and frustration. Kind regards Berkh (talk) 16:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive

 * Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify, 22:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Linkmeon.it
Hi, I have created the page has been deleted because it is considered a marketing piece but I do not understand why all the other pages of the same may exist. I would like to understand why my page is removed and the TinyURL no. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rinorusso (talk • contribs) 14:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Dear Rinorusso, please take a look at the relevant criteria for notability at WP:WEB, and especially WP:WEBCRIT. TinyURL has some significant coverage in media and other sources. As far as I can tell, this does not (yet) apply to likmeon.it. Best regards, --Phileasson (talk) 13:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Deployment Plan
Hello Phileasson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Deployment Plan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: there is now some content. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 14:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013 Wikification Drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

Sam Needham (needs ham)
Just a note. A nudge to say, hey! Sup? I declined your hoax CSD applied to the above noted article. This article is a clear attack on a living person. These types of articles raise a red flag when they are allowed to slip by new page patrollers. It is important that we accurately identify attack pages, while also remembering to blank the content at all times. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me anytime. Cindy (need help?) 09:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. Will keep an eye on that in the future. --Phileasson (talk) 09:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Hoax
Just wondering, what makes you think Rildi lumi is a hoax? Uberaccount (talk) 21:31, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Dear Uberaccount, I was trying to find at least a little information about that guy. The Wikipedia entry of his club FK Shkëndija does not mention his name, a google search returned no results, while the club's homepage is under construction, and he is exactly as tall as the original editor User:Klaudio hoxha K.A.H (OK, that might be coincidental). I'm not sure if it's really a hoax, but I couldn't find anything to prove his existence either. Even if he was existing, he does fail WP:NFOOTY (the table describes him as a under-17 player...). I refrained from adding another PROD since the BLPPROD is already there and will most likely result in the article's deletion. Best regards, --Phileasson (talk) 14:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify April Drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

-- Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify.

ARGG
Bold textDON'T DELETE MY PAGE >:( LET ME HAVE MY PAGES AND YOU HAVE YOURS. POO!!!!!! peace love rubber gloves<3  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tteliria (talk • contribs) 14:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 Wikification Drive
This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive
Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To unsubscribe remove your username from this list. EdwardsBot (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Warning templates - escalation of
Hi, you templated Sawantvaibhav23 in four minutes. Whilst the first one was justified, the other two were not, because the user had not made any edits after the first warning (see WP:UW "The user must be given a chance to see, and react to, each warning given."). -- Red rose64 (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Dear Redrose64, thanks for that advice! I warned the user because of separate violations. To be completely honest, I was not aware of the guideline you mentioned and had a slightly different understanding of the warnings system so far. But it absolutely makes sense. To avoid any confusion I have removed the two later warnings from the user's talk page, citing the reasons in the edit summary. Best regards, --Phileasson (talk) 19:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Ramona Pagel
You left a tag on the top of this article, but the tag provide no description of what is wrong. Worse yet, you went to the Talk page, but still didn't say anything. Another editor just used a phrase that describes this activity, which I will start employing. This is tag spam. All a tag is, is you, a single individual, complaining about the article. If there is a problem, rather than spamming and defacing the article with a tag, fix it. If you don't want to or can't fix it, then at least have the courtesy to explain what your complaint is. Otherwise, your unfocused complaining, your defacing the article, is just vandalism. Trackinfo (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Dear Trackinfo, thank you very much for your comment! Maybe I should clarify a few things: 1. Of course, I did place the "citation style"-tag on the article intentionally and, in my opinion, for a good reason. If you take a close look at the references section of the article, you'll see that the first reference uses a quite appropriate inline citation format, the second and third plain URL, and the others are mere external links with no inline citation (although such might be useful). 2. The alternative to this tag would have been to place two tags for "more footnotes" and "linkrot". I always prefer to use as few tags as possible to avoid distraction for the reader. 3. The tag is, again in my opinion, quite self-explanatory. It's a rather short article and the problems meant by the tag are quite obvious once you take a look at the references-section. That's why I didn't see, and still don't see, the necessity to explain anything further on the talk page. 4. I went to the talk page to assess the article, and several others, for the WikiProject Olympics, of which you are a fellow member.
 * I hope, you will accept that I do respectfully disagree with your opinion that placing the 'citation style'-tag on that article constitutes 'tag spam'. Furthermore, while I certainly not take your criticism personally, I could imagine that some other editors would. I would highly welcome if you could use a kind of different wording in such cases and especially try to avoid the term vandalism if possible. Best regards, --Phileasson (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Whilst Phileasson was typing that, I've had a look at Ramona Pagel; and I'd like to clarify the comments above with some links. Of the six refs, three are general refs; two are bare URLs; and one is formatted using . I consider that inconsistency to be an unclear citation style. -- Red rose64 (talk) 23:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You are obviously not the first editor I have run into this. I addressed this situation long ago in my user page User:Trackinfo, continue onto Tagging.  In this case you didn't even specify Link rot, you just left an even more generic complaint.  Its obvious I'm not inclined to waste my time to run reflnks on an article, just for the pure useless satisfaction of perfectly formatting a source.  A properly directed bare URL can take any user to the source of the information, the formatting provides NO additional direction or information.  Fine, if you think that hidden wikiformatting is necessary for the source, you can push the reflinks button yourself.  You didn't.  You took the time to edit the article, but your edit, actually your two edits, served no purpose other than to deface the article and to deface the credibility of wikipedia in general.  The public doesn't see the differences in the formatting of a source, they just see the source of the information.  They DO see your tag as the first thing in the article.  They think there is a problem here.  There is no problem other than your opinion (and obviously that of a few other high level wiki editors) that the sources are not ideally formatted.  So really, your edits are not any more productive than the idiots who edit "poo" into articles. Trackinfo (talk) 00:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turkey at the 2014 Summer Youth Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Tapia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014 Wikification Drive
This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

February 2015 Wikification drive
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

April 2015 Wikification drive.
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to the African Destubathon
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list
Hi Phileasson! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)