User talk:Philhorn

Philhorn, you are invited to the Teahouse!
== Your submission at Articles for creation: Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence (May 10) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pay_%26_Allowances:_Subsistence_Allowance_%26_Right_of_Defence Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pay_%26_Allowances:_Subsistence_Allowance_%26_Right_of_Defence reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence (May 10) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pay_%26_Allowances:_Subsistence_Allowance_%26_Right_of_Defence Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SamHolt6&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pay_%26_Allowances:_Subsistence_Allowance_%26_Right_of_Defence reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 05:24, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence (May 10) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stevey7788 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pay_%26_Allowances:_Subsistence_Allowance_%26_Right_of_Defence Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stevey7788&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pay_%26_Allowances:_Subsistence_Allowance_%26_Right_of_Defence reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

&mdash; Stevey7788 (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence. Thanks! &mdash; Stevey7788 (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence (May 12) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pay & Allowances: Subsistence Allowance & Right of Defence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pay_%26_Allowances:_Subsistence_Allowance_%26_Right_of_Defence Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pay_%26_Allowances:_Subsistence_Allowance_%26_Right_of_Defence reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Pay & Allowances ...
Thanks to all the 'Editors' of Wikipedia (who participated in this Test-Project) for providing sufficient ‘evidence’ to seek a court-administered injunction against viewing Wikipedia in India -- unless Wikipedia prominently displays on its each & every web-page a Disclaimer to the effect that 'Wikipedia is not a reliable resource' (this is already officially admitted by Wikipedia on one of its web-pages, and also by one of its Editors during a ‘Live-Chat’) because its Editors are admittedly not ‘Subject-Experts’ and, moreso, some of them have not even passed High School; hence, they may not be expected even to know the true Definitions of 'Encyclopaedia', ‘Dictionary’, 'Research', 'Research-Paper', 'Research-References', 'Essay' etc -- not to speak of being able to understand well the Philosophy of Law and the methodology of writing Legal Articles.

BTW, I am on the Board of Editors of 3 International Research Journals and am a Peer-Reviewer of another International Research Journal which is published on behalf of Cambridge University (UK), my Articles are published on Editorial Pages of leading National Dailies (English) and are read by Legal Fraternity (including Judges), my Papers are presented at International Conferences & Seminars, I have more than 3000 ‘Followers’ (including Academics, bureaucrats, News-Channels etc) who read my Articles published at LinkedIn -- all of them understand my Articles, Papers etc because they all are highly learned Intelligentsia (they are not individuals who have not yet passed even High School). The above legal exercise began when an 'Editor' published a libellous & false allegation against one of the very Senior Advocates here and, moreso, the concerned person(s) even refused to tender an apology -- rather, those who were duty-bound under the Law to disclose the offender's full & true identity, failed to disclose the same; thereby committing another criminal offence. Request to Editors:- The objections raised by all 3 of ‘Editors’ are about ‘neutrality’ ‘reliable sources’ & ‘notability’. You have not disclosed your educational qualifications, research experience and/or knowledge of Law.

Please note that neutrality means impartiality or non-existence of bias, i.e. it should be neither for nor against a subject-matter; this Article states the subject “as is”, i.e. neither for nor against. And, by implication, all court-Judgments (including those cited in this Article) are taken to be unbiased.

Question 1: Will you please point out a specific portion of the Article which is biased?

The sources cited in the Article are either Government-websites or Law-Reports recognised by Courts themselves; hence, these are reliable.

Question 2: Will you please specifically point out that source which, according to you, is not reliable?

With regard to notability, please search Google on ‘subsistence allowance case law’; you will get thousands of cases where the existing Law has been discussed & applied -- such references are ‘secondary’ sources because these do not create new Law. Moreso, the meaning of ‘subsistence allowance’ in 3 Continents/sub-continents has been discussed, viz. The Americas, Europe & India.

Please note that in Research, Dictionaries, Encyclopaedias, Courts & Law the emphasis is always on ‘primary’ evidence, ‘primary’ sources etc.

Question 3: Will you please disclose the basis on which you have arrived at a ‘conclusion’ that the subject-matter is not notable? Philhorn (talk) 02:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:26, 12 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Note: Original CU block executed by Bbb23. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:57, 12 May 2019 (UTC)