User talk:PhilipRanky

Welcome!
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Customer relationship management. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Kuru  (talk)  20:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm John of Reading. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Corporate entertainment because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 11:42, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The article could do with more references, but I think it would be far better to use, say, academic studies and trade analyses that are independent of any corporate entertainment company. Once company A is allowed to link to their website from the Wikipedia page, companies B, C and D will want do the same. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:49, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typemock (January 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Becky Sayles was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Typemock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:PhilipRanky Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Becky_Sayles&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:PhilipRanky reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 B E C K Y S A Y L E S  06:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Typemock


A tag has been placed on Typemock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 17:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text to this page. Kuru  (talk)  23:39, 15 July 2015 (UTC)