User talk:Philip Kastner at Exchangium

Potential COI
Hello, Exchangium, and thank you for your contributions. I noticed that you're working on an article in your sandbox that matches your username. If you are closely connected to the topic, I recommend reading Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest editing. In general, if you are paid to edit Wikipedia or are closely related to a topic you're working on, you are expected to disclose the connection. Good places to do this are your user page or the article's talk page. You do not need to disclose how you're connected to the topic.

If you have any questions – relating to this or anything else – feel free to contact me on my talk page, ask at the Teahouse, or place the text  on this talk page. Thtatithticth (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit. Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87". If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   07:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Exchangium


A tag has been placed on Exchangium, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fiddle  Faddle  09:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Deb (talk) 10:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Should you re-create Exchangium
It is mandatory that you use the process starting at the big blue button at WP:AFC. Yi are not entitled to move drafst with which you have a conflict of interest into main article space. This draft would have been pushed back to you for proper referecing. For the future, we require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make any draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Fiddle  Faddle  10:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)