User talk:Philipdarby2

Beatles "considered by many to be the most critically acclaimed"
You should probably read this Avoid peacock terms before you edit the Beatles article again. You keep getting reverted because you're not following the policy. I'm guessing you don't know what the policy is, so whatever, I'm just throwing it out there for you. – Zone46 21:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to The Beatles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Freshacconci 14:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Trusilver 22:31, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Beatles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Liverpool Scouse 01:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to The Beatles, you will be blocked from editing. Freshacconci 14:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Philipdarby2 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Freshacconci 14:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)