User talk:Philipnelson99/Archives/2024/February

Not sure why my edits were reverted?
Hi - I was trying to change the name of Zoom Air to Zooom Air as that is the company’s legal name. Not sure why my edits were reverted. Sahilm2002 (talk) 19:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry, it looks like you are indeed correct. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Sahilm2002 I've moved the page to Zooom Air. Feel free to remove my warnings I've given you. I'm very sorry! Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Soap character
Soap character Hope logan is currently in a relationship with soap opera character thomas forrester Toriul (talk) 20:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Per the biography of living persons policy, that needs a source. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
i am sad 2607:FEA8:439C:1C00:20C3:211D:A97F:6E95 (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Why were my edits removed?
My edits were removed on the page Lobotomy. I added a short section about the new meaning of lobotomy in internet culture, stemming from the game "Geometry Dash", but it was removed and marked as "vandalism". I was attempting to add important information to people who might be confused about the slang meaning of Lobotomy, not vandalise the page. Why was it removed? 72.35.112.198 (talk) 02:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)


 * See WP:TRIVIA. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Arav Chowdharry's page...
Hi there, could you please change Aarav Chowdhary's name to the correct spelling of Arav Chowdharry. This is the correct spelling of his name. Please check social media accounts and current publications for correct spelling. Thank you! 71.222.3.24 (talk) 02:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)


 * ✅, you have my apologies for misunderstanding earlier. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

How can facts be marked as vandalism?
Albert Einstein never did have a Tesco Clubcard. If you can verify otherwise, then I agree with your decision to remove from the Tesco Clubcard edit I made.

Equally, Napoleon Bonaparte never did own a Renault Espace.

Both fact, now both removed as vandalism. Madness. Sterling Moth (talk) 22:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Question
Related to EFFPR, how could you be able to respond to reports so fast? I'm asking this because I'm curious to know. Thank you. – 64andtim  ( talk ) 01:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @64andtim well I read through the filter log, it's usually pretty clear based on the latest filter log what happened. but I also use User:DannyS712/EFFPRH to quickly respond to replies. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

ESSURE
I AM AN EXPERT ON ESSURE. I NOTICE THE ARTICLE, ESPECIALLY PARAGRAPH 1, IS RIDDLED WITH FALSE INFO. CAN THIS BE CHANGED? 2600:8800:7C80:D50:D52E:42AA:8ABC:A43 (talk) 04:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks a lot man I’m just trying to get a hang of this not really sure how to hide my IP but I appreciate you looking out. Seems like no one ever does. I’ve been having a lot of trouble with somebody hacking my phone and on my Apple products, but I just want to say thanks man For the little handout 172.58.144.167 (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

HOW THE FDA USED THE ESSURE DEVICE TO STOP MEDICAL DEVICE ADVERSE EFFECTS REPORTING, INVESTIGATION, AND SETTLEMENTS
1. ESSURE WAS NOT RECALLED. FDA STOPPED IT'S SALES. THE NEXT MONTH, BAYER COULD ANNOUNCE "SALES ARE DOWN" AND STOP SELLING IT.

2. ADVERSE EFFECTS REPORTING WAS STOPPED BECAUSE THERE WERE 15-20,000 CLAIMS PER YEAR. BAYER WAS TO REFUTE ALL COMPLICATIONS/DEATHS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVICE AND STOP THE ADVERSE EFFECTS REPORTS. A FACEBOOK PAGE WAS CREATED (THE DATE IS PUBLISHED) AND THE ALGORYTHMS OF THAT SOCIAL MEDIA PAGE WERE USED TO MAKE THE STATS TO REPLACE THE REPORTING METHOD. PHYSICIANS WERE INCENTIVISED $10-15,000 ANNUALLY TO PROMOTE THE DEVICE AND DO THE INJURY REPORTS. THE FINAL STATS ARE : 5.5% OF THE CLAIMS SUBMITTED WERE REPORTED, AND, OF THOSE, 89% WERE NONCOMPLIANT FOR FDA INVESTIGATION. THE FDA STATS ON ESSURE WERE CREATED FROM SOCIAL MEDIA ALGORYTHMS EVERY MONTH FOR YEARS AND COMPILED INTO A PUBLIC DATABASE. THERE ARE NOW LAWS TO KEEP MEDICAL DEVICE CLAIMS OUT OF LAWSUITS

THE ESSURE FACEBOOK PAGE CONTAINED 3 THINGS. TESTIMONIAL FROM A GROUP OF WOMEN JUST RELEASED FROM THE FIRST BIG ROUND OF ESSURE REMOVAL PROCEEDURES (HYSTERECTOMY), SAYING HOW MUCH BETTER THEY FELT RIGHT AWAY. THEY REPLIED TO QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS WITHIN MINUTES. THERE WERE SEVERAL VIDEOS POSTED OF A SUPPOSED "ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY" WHICH DEPICTED A HUGE ROBOT ARM INSIDE A "WOMEN", SWINGING A BLOODY AX BACK AND FORTH, LITERALLY CHOPPING HER UTERUS TO SHREDS, WITH THE CAPTION "PROCEEDURE AVAILABLE FOR ESSURE REMOVAL AT THIS TIME". THERE WERE FREQUENCIES ON THIS PAGE, VALIDATING THE THREAT. FINALLY, THERE WERE A FEW HEARTFELT PLEAS FOR HELP FROM WOMEN SWOLLEN, BRUISED, AND IN SHOCK FROM THE PROCEEDURE 2600:8800:7C80:D50:D52E:42AA:8ABC:A43 (talk) 05:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Um, can you please just cite sources for claims, and please don't shout at me or in articles. Philipnelson99 (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you ask specific changes that you can make, please make them. If someone reverts you, you can always visit the article's talk page and discuss there. Philipnelson99 (talk) 05:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Texas_Band_of_Yaqui_Indians
Thanks man for helping me out. I was about to revert again but waited for not violating 3RR. CSMention269 (talk) 04:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I mean it's pretty clear. I think the warning I've given them on their talk page will stop them for now and you can actually discuss on the talk page. @CSMention269. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I will keep an eye on them for now. CSMention269 (talk) 04:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, even though I removed my report from WP:AN3 it looks like they are probably going to get noticed by an admin at this point anyway based on their most recent contributions. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah! How could they be so self endorsed? God knows! CSMention269 (talk) 04:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @CSMention269 blocked indef now for multiple reasons, including a legal threat. Philipnelson99 (talk) 05:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Token (rapper)
someone has listed incorrect information in the first 2 or so paragraphs which i tried to fix such as him weighing 140 pounds in 4th grade (as per the sourced article) and not 240; as someone seemingly entered to make a joke about his childhood obesity. if you actually take time to review the sources you will see that he also started rapping at age 6 - not age 16: and was introduced to it by his sister, not justin bieber lol. it also says he was diagnosed with "autism" due to not understanding expressive language...that is also false - as in the sources he was diagnosed with a learning disorder i believe and possibly anxiety and depression; although i am not certain. all i know is the autism comment is untrue and was put in with malicious intent as i stated earlier.

in the second paragraph it starts off with saying he aspired to be a "pop-star" which is also false...he aspired to be a rapper - and became one. again; another instance of you not actually reading the citations. the writing poetry bit is true but he did not start writing "pop songs" at all he started writing "rap songs" at an age well before 17 (the listed one, which again is completely false, done in ill intent, and i believe the age is closer to 9-11 years old if you ACTUALLY READ THE ARTICLE).

to finish with the bs that someone has put here; it says at the end the main artists he listened to were "justin beiber", "vanilla ice" and "limp bizkit"...if you read the two articles following that - again - highly incorrect information you will find that he listened to "2pac", "eminem" and "ludacris" (previously listed in that order when the article was correct).

Goldy himself has also mentioned in later articles that he believes the goat is Lil Wayne, and also makes jokes about going "pop" just to troll his critics...i am not sure if that is the reasoning the edits were made, as maybe it was a fan like me who was just playing around with insides jokes HE SHARES that are not an attack on him as a human being at all...however i now realize i want the article to present the correct information as i respect him as a fan and more importantly has some ties to the dude.

after reading further into the section under his Career labelled "2012-2014: Career Beginnings" it states (again blatantly falsely) - His first song was a freestyle to "Party in the USA" by Miley Cyrus. It was actually stated in the article is: Soon, Goldberg’s diary-like writing turned into poems, and the poems turned into raps. He started recording himself when he was 10 years old, using GarageBand and rhyming over beats playing from the computer’s speakers. They were self-therapy sessions set to music. “I was basically hiding them from everybody, because they were for me,” he says. But one day, a friend found them on his computer and pushed him to create a YouTube channel and upload them. After some protest, Goldberg relented, releasing his first song to the world — him rapping over the beat for Lil Wayne’s “Drop the World” featuring Eminem.

So please. stop allowing this man to be slandered for no reason and when GOOD changes are made do not immediately reverse them just because i didn't cite a new source that IS ALREADY THERE FOR YOU TO READ IN THE ARTICLES COVERING HIS EARLY LIFE. it is an embarrassment to wiki as a whole that you continue to allow such false and demeaning information about a human being to be perpetuated online while apparently you are supposed to be the one taking down said false information; instead of being the almighty wiki hand of god that strikes down anyone that tries to help.

yes i goofed around at the start and said he made a song called "ILY HOP" and a couple other light hearted stuff that are all inside jokes with him...however i stopped immediately once i realized how butchered his page really is.

IF YOU CARE ABOUT ACCURATE INFORMATION I ADVISE YOU TO READ THROUGH THE ARTICLE YOURSELF AND MAKE THE NECESSARY CHANGES IF YOU WON'T LET ME DO IT MYSELF.

this is not an attack on you, i am simply frustrated as i was genuinely trying to fix things on the wiki after trolling once (which is my fault) in an attempt to put the correct information about Ben and stop the slander he is subject to - whether it be a fan or a hater doing it; Ben actually has a very intriguing early and even current life story (especially with his father passing away and using that as positive energy to carry with him on stage, as his dad was a musician like him. which is heartwarming to know how it inspires him everyday) and i believe it vital to pay homage to the hardships he's endured and the hard work he has put into molding his career throughout his entire lifetime.

Thank you for reading all of this and I hope the right changes finally get made; it seems you and I actually think more alike than I assumed at first. So I appreciate it and hope the rest of your day/night treats you well!

Sincerely,

Txmplate Txmplate (talk) 12:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Txmplate, I'm sorry, the source does indeed show the weight as 140. The other changes I cannot verify and per WP:BLP claims in articles about living persons must be sourced properly. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

yadayada
y did u revert my edit ????? Chelsealoveskpop (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)


 * You've made a grand total of two edits, neither of which have been reverted. Not sure what you're talking about @Chelsealoveskpop. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Ohhhh ok haha . I'm a little doofy sometimes . Have a good night !! :) Chelsealoveskpop (talk) 03:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I do want to point you to the page about using multiple accounts for abuse and block evasion since your first action besides making a user page seems to indicate that you have used another account. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

You keep beating me
to the revert button! Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Regarding recent edit
Hi, I had a student reference Wikipedia in a collegiate science course. I added a small statement (which I screenshotted and then navigated back to remove) to demonstrate that even though there are individuals and filtering systems monitoring pages, anything can be added, we don't know what may beat the monitoring system, and we need to go to the original source. Wikipedia can be great as a concise guide that leads to original sources, but we want to cite those original sources rather than Wikipedia pages. Glad to see things were corrected rapidly!

Take care! 24.214.25.171 (talk) 22:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @24.214.25.171 you really shouldn't do test edits in articles. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)