User talk:Philippayoung

Welcome!

Hello, Philippayoung, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The What Took You So Long Foundation, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of The What Took You So Long Foundation


The article The What Took You So Long Foundation has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Promotional and unsourced. Does not credibly  assert notability  for organisations.  Independent  third party  sources not  found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The What Took You So Long Foundation


A tag has been placed on The What Took You So Long Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Cind. amuse  16:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This reply was posted on the now deleted article's talk page.
 * The primary issues with the article include promotional tone, lack of notability, and lack of reliable and independent sources. I would recommend removing the "Manifesto" section of the article. The Manifesto section is entirely promotional, even to the point of encouraging readers to "CREATE A MOVEMENT; Join us". This information is not appropriate for an encyclopedia and is better suited for your website. Notability for organizations is established through our general notability guidelines and topical notability guidelines. In order to remain on Wikipedia, the article needs to establish notability through significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. At this point, the Creative Lab article/interview is the only source that provides significant information about the organization. The other sources only briefly mention the organization in support of a separate subject. Can you locate reliable and independent sources to support the content in the article? This should be the highest priority in the effort to establish notability. It is also important to directly state what is significant and important about the organization. What sets the organization apart from others with similar mission and focus? What are some of the accomplishments of the organization? Have they received recognition, honors, or awards? This type of information is vital to notability. Remember that all assertions in this manner need to be verifiable through reliable and independent sources. Feel free to contact me if you have questions. Best regards,  Cind. amuse  17:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Cheers. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 19:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)