User talk:Philippe17121

Speedy deletion nomination of Philippe Gérard
Hello Philippe17121,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Philippe Gérard for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why you are important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted (your vanity is not a reason) and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you have written yourself. And its not a good idea to write articles about yourself.TheLongTone (talk) 11:18, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Philippe Gérard, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:13, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of On A Long Breath (film)


A tag has been placed on On A Long Breath (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:45, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at On A Long Breath (film), you may be blocked from editing. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Notability and promotion
I've had to delete the pages because ultimately it was very promotional (the film article) and there were issues of notability (the biography).

The film article was promotional because it was written as a WP:SOAPBOX for the film and the viewpoints therein. Stuff like "impressive performances" is pretty unambiguously promotional. This was also in the article for Gérard, since you added in things like "This film is a poetic underwater trip with the quadruple world champion of freediving emphasising the importance of respecting and coexisting peacefully with our beatiful planet." That's a personal opinion at best and at worst it comes across like you're trying to sell the film to people. As for notability, the issue is that ultimately you didn't show where this film or the director has received coverage in independent and reliable sources. You have WP:PRIMARY sources like official websites and you also tried to use Wikipedia as a source - something that is not permitted on here except in extremely rare circumstances.

Offhand I just don't see where either the film or its director would pass notability guidelines even if the promotional tones were cleaned up. It does look like you're probably the person himself, so I'd like to ask that you not take this badly - notability guidelines on Wikipedia are extremely strict and there are a lot of people who do not pass. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:51, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, I noticed that a new account, Reveuse73, has signed up to Wikipedia for the sole purpose of defending your articles. Per WP:MTPPT, please do not recruit your friends, family members, or communities of people who agree with you for the purpose of coming to Wikipedia and supporting your side of a debate. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

I take your two deletion as an offense and lack of respect to someone who is not my friend (reveuse). everything was only factual and you interpreted the way you wanted to turn these pages down. I am not sure what to think about Wikipedia

Your contributed article, 3D comfort and acceptance


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 3D comfort and acceptance. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 3D film. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 3D film – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at 3D comfort and acceptance. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:48, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

i tried to edit today something that is connected to a research project which is not promotionnal at all i didnt even mentionned name. at the middle of the editing, you already put a deletion. i think i will never contribute to wikipedia if nothing i write and all the time i spend is useless

Nomination of 3D comfort and acceptance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3D comfort and acceptance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/3D comfort and acceptance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -War wizard90 (talk) 22:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

I have sent this link to people who are going to contribute, i do beleive that warning me this is going to be a deletion is a joke right?

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
-War wizard90 (talk) 04:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC) Hi, i did not do "sockpuppetry", i start being very surprised by the behaviour of "War Wizard" who spend his time to really demotivate me to continue to add content on Wikipedia, by lack of politeness and now by accusing me of a kind of felony. Good luck with the investigation and i hope you will apologize when you will have the truth. You have to know that I did send this link to the french government that sponsors this public work in order to show that i was doing my work of publically give for free some simplified results of the research in order to help people to be sensitive to the quality of 3D and not always condamn the 3D format. there is rarely hyper sensitivity to 3D, but there are a lot of errors in 3D content creation, and I dont want to give title where 3D issues are found. in the "3D film" page, you allow in the health topic a "3D Bashing" based on the self declaration of someone found on a blog, that broke his arm, because he saw the film 3D jurassic world. I sent this link to the 3D community to react. i hope they will do. Sincerely.

Hi again, i place here the text that Philippe Roy, CEO of a cluster just wrote to defend my writing, because he wrote in a upper section of the deletion talk "Hello, My name is Philippe Roy and I am Deputy CEO of Cap Digital, a 900 members cluster of startups, large research bodies and large corporations. We label collaborative research projects and 600 of them have been funded since the cluster creation in 2006. Research results are generally private but we encourage dissemination and vulgarization of research results. 3D Confort and Acceptance is a resarch program on the acceptance of 3D Content. Its results, written in a vulgarization way as was this page before deletion is of public interest to understand how to improve its acceptance of 3D Contents.82.229.147.55 (talk) 05:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)"

consider this very high level contribution before deletion, and I hope you will stop trying to accuse me of any kind of felony that i find very negative in the worldwide process of helping Wikipedia to be a very valuable source of information. I edited a huge paragraph about a very famous discomfort that is key to 3D format development, I dont see that part located in the same section that the gossip of the health section of your "3D film" page. I hope to be treated with respect in the future on your plateform! i am writing on your plateform on the behalf of very serious governmental organizations, i suggest WarWizard to stop considering this topic as useless.

Hi, when are you going to remove the sockpuppetry accusation? a friend of mine yesterday told me that this is a public information in fact and he could see it. this is calomny in my case since i didnt do it. can you remove this message today please?

July 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Jenks24, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

I am going to tell you what is going to happen here. you removed a valuable content that people validated, you didnt reply to any of the talk and you made an important prejudice about writing on a public page that i was somehow guilty of any felony. since i dont accept to be treated that way and loose my time to contribute on your encyclopedia. i am taking a lawyer now because of the prejudice you caused to me

is it more clear?

thank you to send me the contact for legal issues sincerely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Favonian (talk) 17:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)