User talk:Philizabeth

May 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Joel Gustaf Berghul has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Joel Gustaf Berghul was changed by Philizabeth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862171 on 2020-05-13T17:37:26+00:00

Joel Gustaf Berghul
Hi there! I noticed that you've been working on a Joel Berghult article, someone else seems to have made an article in the meantime, which can be located here RoomieOfficial. I've moved the page back to draft so that there aren't duplicate articles in mainspace it can now be found at Draft:Joel Gustaf Berghul. Please feel free to merge anything that you think needs to go into the article from your draft, however please make sure you include reliable sources WP:RS and follow the WP:BLP policies. Thank you Ym2X (talk) 18:42, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Yeah I had actually got permission from Joel to write one and use the photo that I did because that’s what he wanted to use. They happened to beat me to the punch in publishing it yesterday or whenever they did. I wrote a lot more detail and had more sources and that other page is up for possible deletion so it’s upsetting you’ve removed it because I worked hours and weeks on that. It’s under his actual name not his YouTube account. Philizabeth (talk) 19:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

All I had left was to check and make sure my sources and citations were in order but published it quickly because I saw someone else had published one before mine which is off because at first I had named the article RoomieOfficial Philizabeth (talk) 19:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

That other page said it’s up for deletion because it didn’t have enough reliable sources Philizabeth (talk) 19:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The other article has now been kept at it's deletion discussion and the closing remarks were that there are enough sources.
 * I'd also like to mention that there is currently an informal discussion on Talk:RoomieOfficial where the title of the article is being discussed and you are welcome to contribute your opinions on a new article title there.
 * It is such that you cannot upload a photo which you do not hold the copyright to, so Joel will have to upload a photo himself, either to the Wikimedia Commons or to flickr with the correct Creative Commons licence. Please direct him to A picture of you for more information.
 * You are welcome to make additions to the current article at RoomieOfficial as long as you cite reliable sources. If you have a conflict of interest or are being paid to edit you are required to disclose it on your userpage, please see WP:COIEDIT.
 * That being said, I'm sorry someone else beat you to it, it is disappointing, but I think the main thing is now there is a article in mainspace, it has been kept, and hopefully we can make it as good as it can be together collaboratively, if there are any big changes you think should be made please suggest them on the talk page of RoomieOfficial. Best Ym2X (talk) 20:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)