User talk:Philk84

Welcome from Red Director

 * Yep, thanks, I've got the hang of Wikipedia and there's enough resources online to find what I need Philk84 (talk) 15:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luxembourg 3. Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schengen ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Luxembourg_3._Division check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Luxembourg_3._Division?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Link to updated to Schengen, Luxembourg --Philk84 (talk) 09:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Billy Bernard
As per my edit summary, "stats per NFT" - here. GiantSnowman 14:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I thought when you wrote "NFT" you were referring to NFT, but I see now it's the website you got your stats from. However: as the infobox says, "Senior club appearances and goals counted for the domestic league only" - NFT doesn't seem to separate league and cup games. Having said that, the Soccerway link doesn't have the 2008/09 season at all. So it looks like both these resources could be wrong to some extent. How do you think we should proceed with this? --Philk84 (talk) 14:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * NFT is only league stats, as far as I am aware. GiantSnowman 14:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Bernard played against Mondorf (see Fola's Facebook post with the lineup) back on August 12th, so his 2018/19 stats on NFT haven't been updated (so he should be on 144?). Where do you see that the stats are only for league games? --Philk84 (talk) 14:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm trying to find alternative sources that match either Soccerway or NFT for Bernard, but I'm coming up empty. Any ideas how to resolve this one? --Philk84 (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd be inclined to trust NFT's historical stats, and add SW for the current season (I note SW is not cited in the article by the way). GiantSnowman 15:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. That gives us 144 appearances and still on 5 goals. I'll add the Soccerway link, I thought it was already on there.. --15:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Ralph Ferron
The article was speedy deleted as G5: Creations by banned or blocked users. The user who created it was identified as a sockpuppet of a blocked user. Under the circumstances I can't see an issue with the article being re-created - as you point out, the subject is definitely notable.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks . I have some other Luxembourg Football stuff to update first, so it will be a while before I would start to recreate his page -- Phil k84 [[Image:circle-icons-chat.svg|16px |link=User Talk:Philk84 |alt=Talk |Talk]] [[Image:circle-icons-compose.svg|16px |link=Special:Contributions/Philk84 |alt=Contributions|Contributions]] 14:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Lebanon national football team resuls
Hi Phil,

Regarding the discussion on the WikiProject talk page, these are the match counts for each decades for the Lebanon national team:
 * 1940-49: 1
 * 1950-59: 10
 * 1960-69: 31
 * 1970-79: 18
 * 1980-89: 12
 * 1990-99: 63
 * 2000-09: 93
 * 2010-19: 89

As Lebanon has played more games after 2000 (182) than before (135), I don't think it would make sense to consistently divide the articles into groups of two decades (as for example 1940-59 would only have 11 games). Croatia (which is listed as GA status) for example has three sections: 1940-1999, 2000-2009 and 2010-2019 with about 100 games each. If we were to use the same logic for Lebanon this would be the outcome: 1940-99 (135 games), 2000-09 (93 games) and 2010-19 (89 games).

These are the options:
 * 1)  A single article (317 games)
 * 2) 1940-99 (135 games), 2000-19 (182 games)
 * 3) 1940-99 (135 games), 2000-09 (93 games), 2010-19 (89 games)
 * 4) 1940-79 (60 games), 1980-99 (75 games), 2000-09 (93 games), 2010-19 (89 games)

I would opt for either 2) or 3), what's your opinion?

Thanks, Nehme1499 (talk) 16:34, 12 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I've put this on the Project Football Talk Page so that the thread can be continued there, in case other editors have an opinion on this. -- Phil k84 [[Image:circle-icons-chat.svg|16px |link=User Talk:Philk84 |alt=Talk |Talk]] [[Image:circle-icons-compose.svg|16px |link=Special:Contributions/Philk84 |alt=Contributions|Contributions]] 09:39, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)