User talk:PhillipM

February 2017
Hello, I'm The Channel of Random. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to WM3 Pro Cycling have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Channel of Random (talk) 00:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank You
Hello , Thanks to everyone who has helped me in the last several days negotiating and understanding how Wikipedia functions and operations. All the suggestions and revisions were very helpful.

Thank you

Phillip Martindale [redacted]


 * User is being helped on IRC. Primefac (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

WM3 Pro Cycling
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that your edits were in good faith and you are, in fact, new. As you have a WP:COI you should really suggest edits on the talk page of WM3 Pro Cycling where an unaffiliated editor can edit them in avoiding any conflict. I'll give you a breakdown of the reversions - but it would be good for you to familiarize yourself with some of the conventions and discussions at WP:CYC-CD and WT:CYC. Thanks, XyZAn (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sponsors - ideally should be limited to those with their own article, but a concise list of the major ones could be informative
 * Roster - this is already present, we don't need it repeating in the article elsewhere
 * Results - due to the amount of results, these are situated on their own page: List of wins by DSB Bank and its successors - we don't need these adding back to the main article.It should be noted, that additions to the results article should be wins only, listed in the same format as previous results.