User talk:Phineasflin89

A4 is still in Production
Please stop doing any further edits on the Apple A4 article stating that the production ceased in October 2011 if you can't back it up with any sources. As far as anyone knows it's still in production since Apple still sells products based on it, namely the iPod touch (4th gen) and Apple TV 2. -- Henriok (talk) 22:18, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Same deal with the A5 article. YuMaNuMa Contrib 04:12, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of video game consoles (eighth generation), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of video game consoles (eighth generation) was changed by Phineasflin89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936727 on 2011-12-28T16:29:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to PlayStation Vita, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Hounder4 (T)  (C) 16:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)