User talk:PhlegmishPhilosopher

July 2021
Hello, I'm Ifnord. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Glenn Youngkin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 13:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Why is it not constructive to correct the word "falsely" as it was inaccurate? I corrected the text in as balanced a way as I could. I also pointed out the incorrect use of a fictional word in a non-fictional article. I think both of these are correct. The changes did not affect the rest of the content of the article.

I do not understand the "uw-vandalism1" markup. I *am* new to editing Wikipedia articles. There was no vandalism. PhlegmishPhilosopher (talk) 04:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

I have made constructive changes to the article. In a couple of places, the wording was biased, and did not reflect the content of the references sited. The changes do not change the content, only the level of bias. Changes were made in a couple of places to correct spelling.

Wikipedia is supposed to be a neutral source of information, not another source of propaganda.

PhlegmishPhilosopher (talk) 20:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)