User talk:Phoenix-forgotten/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Gareth Hughes 17:15, 5 March 2005 (UTC)

User categorisation
Hey there, thanks a lot for your help with the change to categories for user categorisation. I have created a preliminary project page here: User categorisation. Please make any changes you see neccessary. Thanks again! --thereverendeg 00:47, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

Inkblot image
You asked about Image:inkblot.gif on my talk page... the original of that image came as an outline from one of the websites discussing the cards. I made it solid color myself so it was easier to see. I took Psychological Testing and Assessment class in college and was one of the few students to handle the inkblot cards unattended so can guarantee that the image is accurate (though lacking in full shading like the original). I labeled it as public domain by age, per the discussion on Talk:Rorschach inkblot test. DreamGuy 21:55, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

New user box
Hello Phoenix-forgotten, It's SWD316. Im giving you the user box for your user page called Template:User Member. It's a user box that says your a member of the AWWDMBJ.... Hope you like it! — M o e   ε  04:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I noticed that you tagged the page Image:Books-aj svg aj ashton 01.png for speedy deletion with the reason "This image is hosted on the Commons, and redundant with Image:Books-aj.svg aj ashton 01.svg". However, "This image is hosted on the Commons, and redundant with Image:Books-aj.svg aj ashton 01.svg" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:IFD if you still want the article to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 23:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * About my speedy-delete proposal for Image:Books-aj svg aj ashton 01.png: I thought that "Redundancy" was listed as one of the criteria for speedy deletion. Image:Books-aj.svg aj ashton 01.svg is the exact same image in SVG format. So doesn't that qualify? Phoenix-forgotten 23:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * It is only valid if both images are on Wikipedia, not on Commons. See WP:CSD. Stifle (talk) 23:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Investigation of 169.244.143.115
(Re: "You said here that the IP 169.244.143.115 is under abuse investigation. I checked the reports (and added something) but there wasn't all that much information there, and it was listed under New Alerts instead of Open Cases. What kind of investigating are you doing? Have you made progress? Phoenix-forgotten 19:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)")

Efforts are being made to contact the administrator responsible for this network, and trace the source of the long term vandalism associated with it. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 19:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * By the way, if you find yourself blocked when attempting to edit from any network resource, please try using our SSL connection at https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Special:Userlogin &mdash; this has worked with mixed results, but is worth a shot in the interim. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 19:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

SimCopter Shenanigans
Hiya. I originally followed this controversy in PC Gamer (my god, back when printed magazines were worth a shit), so off the top of m yhead I didn't have any sites.

I remember there being a few Geocities webpages on SimCopter, but by the time I had graphical internet (circa 1998) it was already considered an old school game.

One page I found while googling that mentions the controversy is http://www.langston.com/Fun_People/1996/1996CFM.html -- another is http://lists.samurai.com/pipermail/bryans-list/1996-December/001811.html -- apparently the programmer who inserted this easter egg was fired. Go figure - and here we have people trying to push the view that the Clinton years were all about tolerance. What a load.

ANYWAY, before I go off on a political tangent, check out those sites, and I'll try to find some actual SimCopter sites at some point (though I get the feeling this will be a fruitless endeavor) --Nugneant 01:12, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Changes to blocking policy
Hi there, I noticed you made a change to our blocking policy. I'd like to politely contest this - although there is the option whereby existing registered accounts are not blocked, this isn't always the case. There are circumstances where blanket blocking is still used. I do however see why you removed it because it could cause confusion amoung new editors, and we should try and sort this. I've restored the paragraph for now and was hoping that we might rewrite it to explain that with the new features this isn't always an issue. Is this okay with you? Thanks. &mdash;Xyra e l / 20:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Correction - someone else restored it before me. I still think we should discuss rewriting it though. &mdash;Xyra e l / 20:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not an administrator myself and my test wiki doesn't have the features, but I think it breaks down something like this. Hope it makes sense. &mdash;Xyra e l / 14:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Username-based block
 * No additional choices
 * Autoblocks apply
 * IP-based block
 * Choice to block account creation
 * Choice to allow existing accounts to edit

Speedy deletion of Template:MultiLicenseWithCC-ByNCND
A tag has been placed on Template:MultiLicenseWithCC-ByNCND requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:US Surgeons General
A tag has been placed on Template:US Surgeons General requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Category:Creative Commons Attribution License
Category:Creative Commons Attribution License, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 21:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Spencer mansion listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spencer mansion. Since you had some involvement with the Spencer mansion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:19, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

"Help:Ref" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Help:Ref and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 23:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)