User talk:PhoenixEcho

May 2016
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at X-Men: Apocalypse, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- samtar talk or stalk 13:35, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Account previously editing as --  samtar talk or stalk 13:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Why was my contribution to the X-Men Apocalypse page removed for no good reason? All i did was added a positive review (with link to source) to the existing negative reviews? How is that not a positive contribution to the page or constructive in any way?
 * It's disruptive when you remove the whole section repeatedly (as an IP and as this account) (diff) and replace it with your review. Also, your source is hardly reliable as it is a blog. -- samtar talk or stalk 14:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

I admit that removing the whole section was a mistake and a knee jerk reaction to mine being removed, and I apologize for that. But I disagree at your suggestion that my source was not "reliable", how is that exactly? Because its a blog? Why does where the review come from matter? It could be written on toilet paper, buts still a legit review, the blog owner has been given a viewing of the film, and written his view on it and it should be considered as legit.


 * Read WP:RS, WP:Referencing and Tutorial. Also please sign your messages. -- samtar talk or stalk 14:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)