User talk:Phongdalat

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Linh phuoc pagoda
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Linh phuoc pagoda, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.mimosatravel.info/da-lat-info/linh-phuoc-pagoda.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Linh phuoc pagoda
Hello Phongdalat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Linh phuoc pagoda for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LS1979 (talk) 07:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Response to contestation of speedy deletion

 * Hello User:Phongdalat; I'm sorry, but the first paragraph is a direct copy of the Mimosa Travel website description of the pagoda, as linked to by the bot (automated program). In any event, you need to make sure that articles are written as neutral encyclopaedic entries rather than promotional travel pieces. At a minimum, you need to remove that paragraph from Mimosa and rewrite it in your own words; you also need to leave out addresses and establish why the pagoda is notable other than that it exists, and give references to that effect. LS1979 (talk) 10:29, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Van Hanh pagoda


The article Van Hanh pagoda has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)