User talk:Photobookpro85

Welcome!

Hello, Photobookpro85, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Edison (talk) 17:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Great Commission church movement
The article contains some referenced text about criticism of the movement, as well as the movements acknowledgment of errors. In your recent edit to the introduction, you have removed all mention of there having ever been such criticism, which violates the requirement of presenting a neutral point of view. Rather than revert your edits, I ask that you restore an appropriate summary style mention of the criticism in the intro. You seem to be quite familiar with the movement, so I'm sure you can present an accurate brief statement of the criticisms, even if you do not agree with them. Thanks.Edison (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Great Commission church movement, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. The assertion that GCC and GCM are unrelated defies historical and contemporary fact. The removed content bears this out. Please stop removing content. If you'd like to discuss this further, Talk:Great Commission church movement is a great place for it. Thank you. ClaudeReigns (talk) 04:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ClaudeReigns (talk) 10:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for one week, for the following reasons. You have persistently edit warred to try to impose your own preferred version of an article, against consensus. You have shown no willingness whatever to take any notice of messages form other users, and have not responded to them. You have repeatedly removed sourced information from an article, in ways which make it abundantly clear that your purpose is to make that article reflect your own preferred point of view, and to suppress any record of other points of view. It is clear that you have a conflict of interest, as you are personally involved in the subject about which you have edited, but you have made no attempt to set aside your potential conflict of interest, but on the contrary have deliberately sought to promote your position. A Wikipedia article should give balanced coverage to all points of view, and Wikipedia does not exist to serve as a medium for members or representatives of organisations to publish those organisations' own preferred pictures of themselves. Before editing again, when the block expires, you should carefully read Wikipedia's guidelines and policies on edit warring, conflict of interest, neutral point of view in articles, and consensus in editing, to make sure that you don't make the same mistakes again. Please note that, since your unhelpful editing has been going on for nearly ten months, a block for one week is minimal. I trust that you will make efforts to avoid making the same mistakes again after the block has expired, but if you do continue in the same way then there is a serious risk that you will be blocked for much longer. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)