User talk:Photographer5000

April 2007
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Log Cabin Wilderness Camp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Gadget850 ( Ed) 11:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

If you created the original text on that site, then you can certainly release it to Wikipedia. The problem is that your site has a copyright tag and we cannot use text that is copyrighted or has any conditions such as "non-commercial use only". If you change the tag on your site, then we can re-incorporate the text. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 12:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Since the site no longer has copyrights, you can revert the text. User:Evrikwas starting to work on the article. Thanks for resolving this quickly. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 14:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Log Cabin Wilderness Camp
I have nominated Log Cabin Wilderness Camp, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Log Cabin Wilderness Camp. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Optigan13 (talk) 02:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey, i just got your message. I have been busy building a website for Forest Lawn Scout Reservation, and i was thinking of putting up an article for them too. But then i noticed that my previous article was gone. after reading the discussion i noticed that more people opposed deleting it. Also, the text from the website and the article is directly from the leaders guide that we wrote. I see no problem with it being "copyrighted" i personally wrote a lot of it using a previous version, all created by our staff. Im just sorry i didn't get here in time to cast my vote. --Photographer5000 (talk) 06:57, 14 February 2010 (UTC)