User talk:Photographynepal


 * }

July 2013
Hello, I'm Thomas.W. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Dip pen without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Do not change existing links to relevant articles, like the link to the pen trade in Birmingham, to links that are of no relevance to the article! Thomas.W   talk to me  11:48, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Dip pen, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thomas.W  talk to me  11:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Thomas.W. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kassapa Buddha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thomas.W  talk to me  12:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Please do not add or change content withoutverifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:06, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ink, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W  talk to me  14:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gilli-danda, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thomas.W  talk to me  14:20, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:50, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid  ( Talk ) 02:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC)