User talk:Photosharesoftware

The article Photosharesoftware has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Psi-puss
A tag has been placed on User:Psi-puss, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --Dynaflow  babble  20:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

hangonHi i changed the name from psi-puss to Photosharesoftware, now what is the problem please?

Its a free script and i see you have other paid scripts on wikipedia like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayzz

Rayzz is the name of the script, it has the username same as the script and its not free

and i know of many others, i was doing my page the same so it will fit wikipedia guidlines, i dont see how you can delete a free script when i see many that are paid and here on wiki, please unban this page

Regards Pete Soper

[promotional material removed  --Dynaflow   babble  00:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)]

April 2009
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See FAQ/Organization and Conflict of interest''.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and forbidden by policies, and also violates our username policy.

However, if you feel that there has been a mistake in your blocking, please appeal this block by adding the text   or email the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Please check that your new username has not already been taken by checking this list.

{{unblock} Or can i make a donation of $500, honestly we worked on this thinking we did it right and dont see the problem and changed it to remove the psi-labs link and will get some refferance links and pay a donation, i have seen many posts worse than mine, one of you guys has even a 4 leter word and i am the ogre? can i pay one of you to fix the page if it needs it? }


 * Hi there. Edit for hire is a very bad idea. A company called User:MyWikiBiz was permanently banned for selling articles to clients. Microsoft similarly caused themselves a great deal of bad press by paying someone to edit their Wikipedia article. The problem with edit for hire is that an editor paid by an organization will almost inevitably violate neutral point of view, one of Wikipedia's most important policies.  What it boils down to is that if a topic, in this case a piece of software, is truely notable then likely someone independent and neutral will be along soon enough to create an article. Kind regards,  Nancy  talk  08:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)