User talk:Phronko

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! &mdash; T h e - t h i n g  (Talk)   (Stuff I did)   23:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Ummm thanks! Wow, I sign up and a minute later I've got a welcome message. Friendly people 'round here. :) Phronko 23:42, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yea. But not everyone's freindly. &mdash; T h e - t h i n g  (Talk)   (Stuff I did)   23:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Dang. Well, at least some are. I'll be sure to be nice and friendly myself.
 * Well, that's it. And don't forget to sign your posts with ~ . &mdash; T h e - t h i n g  (Talk)   (Stuff I did)   23:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * And you can make a userpage too! &mdash; T h e - t h i n g  (Talk)   (Stuff I did)   23:53, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh yeah, forgot to sign! Thanks again! I'll check out making a userpage.  Sounds like fun. Phronk 23:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Guestbooks are things you can put on your userpage and when someone goes to your userpage, they sign it. I have one. &mdash; T h e - t h i n g  (Talk)   (Stuff I did)   00:24, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Userpage
Nice userpage. I like your blog too. &mdash; T h e - t h i n g  (Talk)   (Stuff I did)   21:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Parapsychology Experiments
I too would be interested in seeing a record of successful paranormal experiments, that have stood the test of time. So far, when controls are tightened on positive experiments, these results have disappeared. I do not consider myself a skeptic, but rather a genuinely curious amateur historian who has kept their eye on parapsychology for the last 45 years, observing its successes and failures. I have always found the writings in their books and journals by the past and present hotshot parapsychologists fascinating (and a bit bizarre) and most certainly selective. User:Kazuba 31 May 2006

Dean Radin
Why am I not surprised Dean Radin claims to have bent a spoon by an unordinary force, his mind? See: Dean Radin's website, Blog, Doesn't Like the Bent Spoon) Over the edge? This is parapsychology. It never changes. Too bad User:Kazuba 10 Aug 2006 Kazuba I just can't help myself. When Radin bent that spoon was it a stringent experiment? 11 Aug 2006

You knew I'd call, but I don't know if you got the message
Parapsychologist Rupert Sheldrake is in the Yahoo news for telephone and e-mail telepathy. Where do they come from? User:Kazuba 5 Sept 2006

Rating the ToK
Hi. I'm trying to get members of the Psychology Project to get together and rate the both the quality and importance of the Tree of Knowledge System. Hope you're interested. Have a great day! EPM 19:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Restructuring Parapsychology
The parapsychology needs some serious restructuring. Come on over to my sandbox and see how you can help.-- Annalisa Ventola (Talk 07:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Request for peer review
The article Clinical psychology has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the peer review page and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! Psykhosis 20:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

DSM-IV Proposal
Would you consider adding any input to our proposal regarding the DSM-IV. Input is being collected on our talk page. Thanks! Mindsite (talk) 22:09, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Husband Cake
A tag has been placed on Husband Cake requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --Alinnisawest(talk) 02:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror needs your help
 : You've received this message as you are listed as a WikiProject Horror Participant. As you may have noticed, WikiProject Horror has suffered from a lack of direction and coordination of late. A suggestion on how to improve the Project and maintain it as a viable resource has been placed up for discussion here. As a member of the Project, your voice is valued and your input is requested. Thank you, hornoir (talk) 23:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - February 2009
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 02:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - March 2009
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - April 2009
{| width=100%
 * valign=top style="border:1px solid red; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background-color: transparent;"|
 * valign=top style="border:1px solid red; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background-color: transparent;"|

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 05:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

August 2010
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia? Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organization for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. -- Cirt (talk) 01:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)