User talk:Phwikiproj/Cryptococcosis/Skallasj4863 Peer Review

Peer Review Comments
-Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes.

-Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Yes.

-Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.

-Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes the sources support the claims, but make sure all facts/statements are cited with a number relating back to its source number in the citations at the bottom.

-Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? I believe most sources are neutral and appropriate for your article.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? Wondering if the statistics you added (2014-2015) is as recent as possible. If not, add most recent data.

Otherwise, great work! I made edit suggestions in bold.