User talk:Phyllisshandallfrey1996

Your username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Phyllis Shand Allfrey, and I noticed that your username, "Phyllisshandallfrey1996", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Ammarpad (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Operator873. I noticed that you recently removed content from Phyllis Shand Allfrey without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Operator873 CONNECT 22:20, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Phyllis Shand Allfrey, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. (talk to) Gaelan('s contributions) 22:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)