User talk:Physchim62/archive 2005

Ooops!
Please do not remove copyvio listings without stating a purpose for doing so. CryptoDerk 18:52, May 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem. I figured since the times were close together that maybe it was an edit conflict or some such.  Cheers.  CryptoDerk 19:51, May 4, 2005 (UTC)

Bonjour, PF3
Wikipedia needs you! Please sign up as a WikiProject_Chemicals in the Chemicals Wikiproject, especially if you are going to offer free beer!

As for PF3, I am guessing that the HF produced by hydrolysis would be the major hazard. My second guess would be its similarity to CO leading to poisoning that way (see article). Is there an industrial use for PF3, or does this hazard preclude its use? (If there is a large-scale use, I'd like to add it to the page). I'm English but I live now in upstate New York, and Easyjet doesn't reach here, so if I'm right I'll have to wait a while for the beer.

Cheers, Walkerma 15:48, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Transwiki log
Please stop removing old entries from this page. It is a log. Uncle G 17:27, 2005 May 9 (UTC)
 * I can see your good intent, and I don't fault you that. I certainly know it's too long, and only getting longer, but it is more important to me to resolve the actual encyclopedia entries first, rather than worry about some WP namespace page first. I suppose eventually we should create an archive with all the resolved entries to cut down the main page. But we certainly shouldn't delete them, as the whole point of the page is to display the old transwikied articles. In any case, if you want to help, we need more help resolving the entries as per the intructions at the top, and I would be eternally grateful if you could :) --Dmcdevit 23:39, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

VFD
When you VFD an article, please add a ===header=== to the top of the discussion page, i.e..

Radiant_* 19:32, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

Also please familiarize yourself with examples of VFD prposals that the consensus always agrees with. A great majority in VFD found your candidates unquestioned keeps. Lotsofissues 21:13, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Language recognition
Language recognition sites? Heeeeeyyy... tell me more. :-) I didn't even know such things existed.  SWAdair | Talk  09:59, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
 * "I used the two that are linked in the Introduction to Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English" -- doh! It has been forever since I read the introduction to that page.  I guess it helps to slow down every once and a while and re-read things.  Thank you.  SWAdair | Talk  10:03, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

List of Schedule 1 substances (CWC) and Algoz
Hi Physchim62!

I'm sorry to tell you that I nominated the List of Schedule 1 substances (CWC) for deletion, to me it didn't really look like an encyclopedia article. Of course I may be wrong...

On a happier note, thanks for creating a stub to replace the copyvio on the Algoz article!

Sjakkalle 12:23, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Looks like you won the VfD. I have closed the debate. Sjakkalle 06:51, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Carbon-carbon move
I see you have moved Carbon-Carbon to Reinforced Carbon-Carbon (composite). My habit has been to give articles the simplest and most common name available, and carbon-carbon is the term I've heard most often. What prompted this move? Also, I was also under the impression that parentheses were only used where a disambiguation page is appropriate. Was I mistaken about that, or is there some special reason for their use in this context?--Joel 02:02, 22 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Seeing no response, I'm going to move it to Reinforced Carbon-Carbon: the full name makes some sense, but the use of parentheses is just baffling to me.--Joel 07:59, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Another copy of this reply is under yours in my talk page.


 * No worries. I think your concerns about confusing the article title with bonding are valid, and anyone who types in "carbon-carbon" or "RCC" will still be redirected to the same page.  If you end up making a page on carbon-carbon bonding, feel free to co-opt the redirect page, although you may have to compete with organic chemistry or something.  It might be useful to link to diamond cubic and also to the RCC page if you end up making a page on that specific bond.


 * I've also taken the liberty of putting "composite material" in the first sentence of the introduction, which I should have done a long time back. I'm sorry I got a little snippy when I didn't hear back, and I'm glad you got around to responding after all.  Happy editing!--Joel 21:51, 28 May 2005 (UTC)