User talk:PhysicalTV

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 09:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The physical tv company may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. -- Longhair 09:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

hmm, that was a nice welcome. to save Richard James Allen frm a similar fate i've done a bit of formatting etc. it will need to be written as factual, rather than promotional (guidelines biographies are at Biographies of living persons) awards and similar help, links to independent mentions/reviews are necessary for an article to stay & everything has to be referenced. good luck &rArr; bsnowball  11:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Kamikaze
I have deleted your addition to this article, which briefly described Mr. Allen's book. It does not appear that the work was used a source for the article and the mention of the book therefore seems out of place. If you want to discuss it I suggest we do so at Talk:Kamikaze to see what others think. Thank you. Kablammo 01:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Thursday's Fictions
I'm afraid I must decline to restore the page. Advertising is not an issue of being a for-profit enterprise or not. It has to do with the tone and purpose of the page. The page was written in a promotional tone, had gratuitous, repeated external links to the subject's web page, and had no independant references. The latter is likely not as big a deal, as I suspect such could be found if the rest of the article's claims are true, but they are still needed. But this was an advert deletion not a notability one. Please read WP:ADVERT on what makes up an advertising page. You might also want to read WP:COI on why it is generally a very, very bad idea to write articles on projects that you are personally involved in. We all have biases, and personal involvement makes it very difficult to write neutrally about the subject, which is required. - TexasAndroid 18:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I would be willing to restore the article to your user space so that you could work on it there to try to get it into shape to meet the project's requirements. It would need quite a bit of work, though.  Sorry. - TexasAndroid 18:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Karen Pearlman
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Karen Pearlman, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Karen Pearlman seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Karen Pearlman, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Richard James Allen
An editor has nominated Richard James Allen, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Transwiki to a more suitable site
Hi PhysicalTV, As some of your articles are currently under review for deletion, you may wish to consider transferring them to Wikipopuli, a wiki that hosts biographical articles and does not impose a notability requirement. Best, TheYellowCabin (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:TF Poster FINALa.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:TF Poster FINALa.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly hi! 06:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)