User talk:Physicsabootaladdader

Speedy deletion nomination of Devang Buckshee
Hello Physicsabootaladdader,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Devang Buckshee for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amanda Jane Mason (talk) 05:58, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karzan Patel
Hello Physicsabootaladdader,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Karzan Patel for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amanda Jane Mason (talk) 08:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. A little checking showed that every one of the articles you have created was a pack of lies. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Userspace request
Dear Amanda Jane Mason and    JamesBWatson, I have confidence that the articles I ha've created are not hoaxesz, and that they are welll-referenced and true. The "Devang Buckshee" article was about proving Navya Mehta's theorem, not Mudunlal Mehta's theorem.

However, this is your website, and it is your choice that you do not wish to undelete these pages.

May I, however, humbly request you to at least move them (where I make a reference to all the articles I have created that are now deleted  into my user space, i.e. as "User:Physicsabootaladdader/XYZ" where the original title was "XYZ"?.

Or at an even lower expectation, may they be e-mailed to me at  craziumperside [at] gmail.com

Thank you,

Regards,

Physicsabootaladdader (talk) 13:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * No. Contrary to what you say, the articles you created were hoaxes. They even included claims that the people you wrote about had posts at academic institutions which do not, in fact, have any such persons on their books, and you gave completely spurious references, which could easily be checked. One or two things of that sort might have been mistakes, but what you did went way beyond that. Wikipedia's userspace is not for keeping article-like pages that have been rejected as articles, and it is not acceptable to use the Wikipedia servers as a medium for writing your own web pages, for your own use away from Wikipedia, which is what you are asking for when you mention emailing them to you. In addition, the editing of this talk page that you have recently done was sheer vandalism, and, combined with the nature of your other editing, makes it clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopaedia. For that reason, the following applies... JamesBWatson (talk) 14:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Dear  JamesBWatson, while I am confident about the integrity of the articles, I will respect your decision that it was a hoax.


 * However, may I please request that the mark - up be emailed to me at craziumperside [at] gmail.com ? I shall not use the same content on wikipedia, since it is considered to be a hoax; that, I guarantee you.


 * I would like to use this content (of the deleted pages) on a wiki that I will start and host myself, as I believe that it is correct, and well-referenced.  And as for the edits I have made to this talk page, it is only due to me testing out whether the spacebars are automatically eliminated by the system, or not. I hope    that by doing so, I have not caused any damage to wikipedia as I have reversefd all my editts here.


 * Thanking you.
 * Regards,
 * Physicsabootaladdader (talk) 15:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If you read my comments above, you will see that I have already answered the points you raise. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Dear JamesBWatson, from your comments, I understand that you are not willing to move them into my user space as you believe that it is a hoax.


 * However, I only request that you email these articles to me? Please understand that I value these articles a lot and that I consider them to be something rather notable.


 * Thanking you,
 * Regards,
 * Physicsabootaladdader (talk) 08:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Dear JamesBWatson, I await your e-mail. Thank you, & Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Physicsabootaladdader (talk • contribs) 07:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, that is odd, as I have already explained why I have no intention of sending the email you requested. I will not post here again unless something new comes up: I see no point in repeating things that I have already said, and that somehow or other you have failed to hear. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Dear JamesBWatson, in contrary to your claims, I have read your messages, and am only humbly requesting you to revise your decision of not sending me the articles. I shall not add them back to wikipedia, but merely keep them with me, as I consider it   to be something I value, Regards, Physicsabootaladdader (talk) 05:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)