User talk:Pianodream

Image copyright problem with Image:Obama rezko.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Obama rezko.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Obamarezko.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Obamarezko.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Obamarezko.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Obama rezko.jpg. The copy called Image:Obama rezko.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Inappropriate image
Any image used at WP, in particular those used on a WP:BLP page must be neutral. Conflating images of Obama and Rezko together is not neutral but an editorial judgment and therefore inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Please do not recreate this image or you may be blocked for disruption. Ronnotel (talk) 15:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Obamarezko.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Obamarezko.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Ronnotel (talk) 15:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * If you can find an actual, as opposed to a fabricated, image of Obama and Rezko together, and you can substantiate a valid fair use claim, then you are much more likely to be successful in adding it to the page. But making up images where they don't exist is a no-no. BTW, I found you quickly because I had the Rezko article on my watchlist. Ronnotel (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Pianodream, did you take the photo of Obama's house or did you find it somewhere else? If the image is yours, when your block has ended, can you upload just the image of Obama's house and release it under Public Domain or GFDL? One of the problems that you're having with the image is that the pictures of Rezko and Obama are copyrighted and by using those photos in connection with your image of Obama's house, you are violating the copyrights of those images.  If you would upload just the image of Obama's house, it could be used in the article now that Obama's house has been shown in several reliable sources. --Bobblehead (rants) 16:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

{unblock|1.you guys support obama, cuz you think he represents the fair, but you yourself became the old ugly politics. 2. this thing will be reported to hillary campaign, and thus became a help to us. thank you. 3. u want to block me, block as long as possible, but keep it in your mind, it's all the people who are fair and keeping working for you makes your website famous, not your admin. }


 * I'm not sure you can claim fair use on the image though. The image is easily replaceable by a free image (someone can go to Obama's house and take a free picture of the house) and being non-replaceable is one of the criteria for fair use. --Bobblehead (rants) 19:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Pianodream, I think you may be mistaken. I don't recall adding the Clinton/Rezko image to the article and if I did, it was done inadvertently during a period of high load when the page may have gotten out of sync with the database. Does my edit history really read like I support either Obama or Clinton? My only interest here is making sure that a image more suited to an attack ad is not added to the encyclopedia. BTW, please note the previous comment higher up from Bobblehead. If the image of Obama's house is yours, then that might be considered a valid image to post. Ronnotel (talk) 19:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

{unblock} to {unblock|I may be mistaken? are you helping me here?omg. The image about Clinton/Rezko is a free one? So it's allowed? omg. I just found a perfect pic, very real, very Obama+Rezko. and I will post in your way after unblocked. Or if you don't want me to do so, simply delete that misleading Clinton/Rezko pic, I am busy, and decent when not insulted}.

I'd be happy to unblock you now on the condition that you read and agree to abide the policies on non-free content and biographies of living people. Ronnotel (talk) 20:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

{unblock} to {unblock|Ronnotel, I actually feel very disappointed with you and this wiki. I used wiki a lot and I used to feel this is one of the best knowledge banks. However, when my friends sent me the link to rezko wiki, I was shocked. You said this webpage is on your watchlist, then why you ignore the misleading unfair information again and again? You did so, you and wiki lost credits. I am from an organization called hillary prevails, around 1000 graduate students and faculties in top US schools. we supports her, we made videos, we made ad ourselves to promote her in a fair way. Yesterday this link in wiki was sent to all of us, don't you think it affected wiki's public image already? You are just a common person, you are allowed to support anybody, but don't play tricks like that}

Your talk page has been protected and your block reset for your abuse of the unblock tag. Sandstein (talk) 21:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)