User talk:Pianoman12345

December 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. -- Commdor    { Talk }  19:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

CoD: World at War ratings
My mistake, I assumed that the info was true since it appeared sourced. I'll revert the article back to its previous version immediately, and I apologize for inconvenience this may have caused you. -- Commdor    { Talk }  22:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Resistance 2
There don't appear to be any problems there to me. You should be able to edit the article since it isn't protected, unless you were running into edit conflicts with the IP I reverted. In any case, the reviews that are already there are sufficient, since in most vg articles you want to have around 5-7 reviews from highly reputable magazines or gaming sites. You also want to make sure that you add a few "negative" reviews so that the section has balance; if an article has only "positive" reviews, then the claim can be made that the section violates WP:NPOV. But again, the way the section currently looks is fine, and better than a few other articles I know. -- Commdor    { Talk }  00:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Alright, taken care of. I think your problem was with the template's markup; to add a review, a shortened code-form of a review site's name is used in the markup, and if it isn't used correctly a review won't appear in the article. GameTrailers is "GT" and GameSpot is "GSpot" and so on. See Template:VG Reviews for the list of the markup for all accepted review sources. Hope that helps in the future. -- Commdor    { Talk }  18:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)