User talk:Pianoplonkers/Archive 3

 you had in that cell that I removed. It's still little wider, but I don't know what causes that. Svick (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism on my talk page
Thanks for removing it. I can't believe people can be so stupid.--Kalphiter (talk) 02:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Zapdos221
I think your twinkle hiccuped here, as I tagged the page, but you warned the user. In any case, I have removed the warning that you posted them (so as they don't have two duplicate warnings). Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks a lot for you work in the new pages. Kindest regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 17:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine, thanks-- Pianoplonkers  ♫  (talk)  17:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

My Watchlist
When I use Twinkle or Friendly, the page that I am editing is added to my watchlist. Is it possible to stop this?-- Pianoplonkers  ♫  (talk)  17:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. Read the documentation here and here. Algebraist 17:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Both Twinkle and Friendly can be configured, see Twinkle/doc and Friendly.
 * To stop watching all changes made by Twikle and Friendly, add following code to your User:Pianoplonkers/monobook.js (if you use the default monobook skin):


 * Svick (talk) 17:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * When I tried this, it still added the pages to my watchlist. Could you have a look and change my monobook accordingly please-- Pianoplonkers  ♫  (talk)  18:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Right, sorry, I fixed the code above. I can't edit your monobook.js, so you have to do it yourself. Svick (talk) 19:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Warning on User talk:66.204.41.2
Hi. You recently issued an "only warning" to User:66.204.41.2 for this edit on the Template:X2 page. This page is actually a sandbox, so the edit wasn't vandalism. If you don't mind, I'm going to remove the final warning, and then add a level 2 warning for a different unhelpful edit made by this user. Thanks! -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 01:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine, thanks for picking it up-- Pianoplonkers  ♫  (talk)  07:03, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Please look more closely
Hello. :) You recently left a warning template on my talk page.  This is the version of the article that you reverted back to.  Please look a little more closely.  I was reverting vandalism, not causing it.  Compare the version you reverted to with my edit.  I won't edit the article until you've had a chance to check it for yourself because I don't want to appear to be vandalizing in the face of a warning, but I'm sure that once you compare the two versions you'll revert it yourself.  Take care, and happy editing!  152.16.16.75 (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello again. I just wanted to let you know I took care of it.  I saw that you had edited since I left the note above and hadn't had a chance to get to it so I reverted with an explanation in my edit summary.  It has been fixed.  Happy editing!  152.16.16.75 (talk) 02:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks-- Pianoplonkers  ♫  (talk)  07:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Steinway Model D-274
Dicussion copied from Archive of WikiProject's Talk Page (Archive 24) Back in June, I created an article called Steinway Model D-274. However, after discussion, it was decided that the content should be removed and the page be turned into a redirect. I feel that this page, with work, could be considered to be an appropriate article for Wikipedia. Currently, I have a copy of the page in my userspace (User:Pianoplonkers/Steinway Model D-274) and I am trying to improve it. I am writing to ask if anyone would like to help me achieve this and make it a good article. Please contact me on my talk page to inform me that I have found someone that wants to help me. Thanks-- Pianoplonkers  ♫  (talk)  07:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Overall, I would say that it is a fine article. Some additional sources could be used, but that isn't the biggest probem here. I think the assemblage of the "facts & figures" and "encasement" sections are not up to wikipedia's standards, due to their format. The title of the former section is especially not to wikipedia's standards; while it is not trivia (considering how it holds information about the measurements and other useful stuff), it does have the title of a section of miscellaneous information; those sections are definitely discouraged on wikipedia. If I came across this article in its current shape as an article and not just a user subpage, I would support its existence on wikipedia, but improvements would be recommended. Thanks. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 21:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Peer Reviews
helpme

It has been suggested that User:Pianoplonkers/Steinway Model D-274 be peer reviewed. Is it possible to do this? Thanks-- Pianoplonkers  ♫  (talk)  16:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Peer review--Jac 16888 Talk 17:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikitables on Vladimir Horowitz discography
helpme

I was wondering whether you could center all of the images on Vladimir Horowitz discography in the Album cover columns and what code would be needed for this. Please could you please tell me what it is-- Pianoplonkers  ♫  (talk)  10:42, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You can center the images by placing them betweeen the  tags. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) -  13:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)