User talk:Pichemist/Archive 27

The assistance you would like
Let's start from the simple premise that we all start reviewing drafts knowing AfD and notability criteria. And let's add in the fact that our reviewer remit is to accept drafts where we feel that they.

When we start reviewing we, all of us, interpret the criteria too tightly. So lesson one is to learn to relax, and asses them against the above. We might choose to start at a 60% probability and ease back to 50%. Ideally we do not start at 40% and ease up to 50%!

What often helps if to look at another reviewer's AFC log. Mine is at User:Timtrent/AfC log and in the archives. It does not go back to the start of my reviewing history because I only learned how to turn the log on recently. My suggestion is that you sample my acceptances and declines, understand that I also make mistakes, and discuss any you choose with me.

In your view, does that give us a useful basis to move forwards? 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes it dos indeed, thank you and I'm sure to keep that in mind. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs &#124; Talk ) 09:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * You may have any practical help I can give you 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if that was a question, but if it was.. I do not think so, at least not right now. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs &#124; Talk ) 13:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm really happy to see the feature being used this way, I wrote it because I like being able to easily look back on my acceptances but it being a teaching tool is even better. Made my day to see this when I hoped over to see who the new face on the AfC leaderboard was. Rusalkii  (talk) 06:13, 8 January 2023 (UTC)