User talk:Pickersgill-Cunliffe/Archive 2

Happy New Year!


Happy New Year! Hi, Pickersgill-Cunliffe, I hope the New Year is most excellent for you and yours! Best wishes, and I have fun wikifying this year! In spite of what the time clock says, it's January 1 where I'm posting from!

Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andrew Leake
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andrew Leake you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andrew Leake
The article Andrew Leake you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andrew Leake for comments about the article, and Talk:Andrew Leake/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Philip Wodehouse (Royal Navy officer)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Philip Wodehouse (Royal Navy officer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Hebrus
The article HMS Hebrus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Hebrus for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Hebrus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Superintendent of Ordnance
I've had a query at a GA nom of mine: Talk:Elizabeth Parish/GA1. The subject was married to a "Superintendent of Ordnance" at the Tower, later "Ordnance Storekeeper in Gibraltar". I assume this is equivalent to a mid-level administrative post in the Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom), but I haven't got proper sources to confirm that. Do you have a suggestion how to explain this post? —Kusma (talk) 10:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * In essence a functionary of the Board of Ordnance, yes. The board is a particularly annoying organisation to study because, as George Raudzens said in 1979, "No detailed scholarly history of the Ordnance has yet been published. There have been only two attempts to record the department's story", one of which is three pages long! Your best bet might be to describe him as a local representative of the Board of Ordnance, working as part of a committee to fulfil the needs/requirements of the board:
 * "Under [the chief officers] was a diversity of ancillary organizations, most notably bodies known as respective officers, or the R.O., based at "stations" or military districts in Britain and the colonies. Modelled on the parent board, they consisted of the local senior Royal Engineer, artillery officer, surveyor, storekeeper, and clerk. Unlike headquarters in London, they did in fact act collectively as committees, conducted all the necessary affairs within their districts subject only to their own departmental superiors. Again, they were independent of other branches of government."


 * (p.91)
 * If you can get a hold of, that might describe the storekeeper's role in more detail but I don't have access to it. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, and a ping! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! It is a bit surprising that this is so poorly researched, as knowledge of the Board of Ordnance should be very useful in understanding various things like supply issues. But now I feel better about not finding a clear description of what the Ordnance Office was like in the 1790s. —Kusma (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Philip Wodehouse (Royal Navy officer)
The article Philip Wodehouse (Royal Navy officer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Philip Wodehouse (Royal Navy officer) for comments about the article, and Talk:Philip Wodehouse (Royal Navy officer)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 10:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Medusa
Did you get the two pages from Hepper that I emailed to you? If not, I can try again. Cheers, Acad Ronin (talk) 20:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * No, don't think the email reached me. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah. I will try again later tonight my time. 140.147.2.1 (talk) 18:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Did you receive my response (see my user) to your query about the Medusa? I hope the additional data is helpful! Rif Winfield (talk) 11:59, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry for the super slow response! I've been on holiday and am also preparing to be less active on this site. That said, thanks very much for the clarification, I'll make sure to follow the information provided in British Warships when I finish up the draft. I'm not sure I've come across the information on Norman's court martial or post-wreck life as a sheer hulk; do you have any suggestions for any RS that might discuss either event? Thanks again for taking the time to provide such a detailed response to my little query, it's much appreciated and very useful to have one of the topic experts so close to hand! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. You might contact David Hepper concerning the court martial (if you haven't his email address, email me on tanparcau@btopenworld.com for details). Rif Winfield (talk) 09:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for List of generals of the British Empire who died during the First World War
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Andrew Leake
Vanamonde 12:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Lines of Torres Vedras
Is there any reason why you removed the See Also link to the List of Forts, or was it a mistake? Surprised that you would delete it after all the work you put into the list.Roundtheworld (talk) 14:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I haven't removed it, I moved it further up in the article so it was more visible! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Philip Wodehouse (Royal Navy officer)
Vanamonde 00:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Gerald Marescaux
Vanamonde 00:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Retirement?
You've only just got here! I can't see any evidence of you being driven away so can only assume you've found something better to do. Good luck with it, whatever it is, but don't forget to drop back now and then to see if i've any articles that need reviewing. :) --Ykraps (talk) 13:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I won't be going away completely, have no fear! I've been in a long recruitment process which has finally resulted in an offer of employment. It's a job that won't allow me much free time, and on top of that I'll be returning to university for another degree. I won't be able to devote anywhere near the same amount of time to Wikipedia, hence the semi-retirement, but I still hope to very slowly plug away at an article or two! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Well if you manage to rack up even a third of the edits you made last year, I will consider you to be very much still active. :) --Ykraps (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Norcliffe Norcliffe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Norcliffe Norcliffe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Norcliffe Norcliffe
The article Norcliffe Norcliffe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Norcliffe Norcliffe for comments about the article, and Talk:Norcliffe Norcliffe/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for List of Royal Navy flag officers who died during the First World War
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Henry Macandrew
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Henry Macandrew you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Just a reminder that I've done my review and await your response.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I'll handle them myself.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Dyott
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Dyott you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Dyott
The article William Dyott you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Dyott for comments about the article, and Talk:William Dyott/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Hey
I saw your retirement message about RL issues - just wanted to make some sort of message of sympathies/support. Hog Farm Talk 03:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Just saw your message too. I don't know what your going through but you have my best wishes - Dumelow (talk) 08:11, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Also saw your retirement message. I know that Wikipedia can take over one's life; I hope you can start afresh in whatever your RL throws at you now. Even if you never come back, you should still know that you and your work will be remembered and appreciated. I have always enjoyed working with you and wish you all the best. —Kusma (talk) 09:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Another one hoping you're ok and that things work out in the end.©Geni (talk) 15:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Same here. Take all the time you need to work through what you are experiencing. If you want to talk, the Discord is always open. We will be here if you decide to come back to Wikipedia. Hugs MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * And another - realised I'd been missing you on Discord and here. Hope with the extra time you can work through anything in RL. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Don't believe we've ever directly interacted but I enjoy reading your naval history articles and am constantly impressed with the depth of your research into the forgotten byways of the eighteenth century. All the best with wherever life has taken you at present, and hoping to see you back on Wikipedia when things improve. -- Euryalus (talk) 23:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I've only just become aware of your retirement, so this is a somewhat belated message: I hope you are OK and wish you well. You will be missed around the traps. Zawed (talk) 08:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you all for your kind messages. I truly did not expect to return. I needed a miracle and I am the luckiest man in the world in that I got one. Thank you again, and know that I appreciate you all dearly. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It is wonderful news to hear you are OK. —Kusma (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Great to see you are back :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That's great news, really pleased to hear that your RL issues worked themselves out! Zawed (talk) 22:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Very glad to hear things have worked out. See you around! - Dumelow (talk) 18:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Norcliffe Norcliffe
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Henry Macandrew
The article Henry Macandrew you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Henry Macandrew for comments about the article, and Talk:Henry Macandrew/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

B2 Criteria
Hi Pickersgill,

I observe you recently downgraded a series of ~6 articles I wrote from B to C class, due to information in the infobox not being in the main body. Would you be able to elaborate which information exactly is missing in these cases. Apologies to be a hassle, but I'd like to get these fixed back up to B class as soon as I can. Sovietblobfish (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Oops, I should probably specify the articles. Angennes, Elbeuf, Aumale and Mayenne.
 * Kind regards Sovietblobfish (talk) 17:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi no problem! Always happy to explain my actions and thought process. For all four of the aforementioned articles the problem I identified was information provided in the infobox not being present in the main text of the article and thus not being referenced. For example:
 * Elbeuf's exact date of birth is not in main text, nor does the article actually say he was born in Joinville
 * For Aumale his children are in the infobox but not the article (and the date of birth is provided in full and cited in the lede but not main text or infobox?)
 * Mayenne's DOB and place of birth are in the infobox but not main text
 * d'Angennes' DOB is vaguely provided in the lede and infobox but not mentioned in main text
 * On a separate note, might I suggest you try and pare down your ledes? I realise the subjects you're writing about have large articles, but the enormous paragraphs you put in the lede don't make for easy reading, which is really the main point of a lede. Thanks, and feel free to ask for further clarification! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the clarification.
 * As far as DOB's are concerned, its a little frustrating, as they were in the article (unreferenced) before I started working on it (with the exception of Angennes, whose article I created), so I left them be. I can remove them, as in all my 60 books I have nothing that can support them (to my knowledge). What I really need is a genealogy book, that would have all of this detail in it.
 * Regarding Mayenne I was able to find who his daughters married (and hence I put that in the body), but not their names! Again a genealogy is what I need to raid here. Or alternatively I could look on their husbands pages to see if their names are referenced there.
 * As for Angennes, his DOB is in both the lead and the main text. " Louis d'Angennes was born in 1536, one of nine sons of Jacques d'Angennes and Isabelle Cottereau. His father Jacques served as captain of François I's personal guard. In 1552 France captured Metz, and he would serve as one of the cities governors." in the early life and family section.
 * My thanks for your advice regarding lede length, I find it very difficult to moderate myself! Sovietblobfish (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Welcome back
Hope things are looking up for you. Hawkeye7  (discuss)  18:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Seconded. It's wonderful to see that things in your life have looked up; we're glad to have you back. Unlimitedlead (talk) 01:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Philip Honywood
Hi there. I recently noticed that you added an image to the infobox of this article: Philip Honywood (British Army officer, died 1785). I don't mean to sound like a pedantic art historian, but the |the source of the image (ArtUK) states that the image was made in 1700, approximately 10 years before the subject of the article was born. I'm aware that the portrait states that it is intended to be a painting of this Philip Honywood, but I would like to draw your attention to the fact that it depicts a man dressed in Restoration-era clothing of the 1670's (for reference see paintings by this man). Given all this, I think that the possibility that the individual in the painting is actually Philip is very unlikely, unless he intentionally dressed in Restoration dress for his portrait. Would you object to the removal of the painting from the infobox? Dabberoni15 (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I laid a lot of weight in my decision to add the portrait to Honywood on the inscription naming him as such on the work. I do agree that the 1700 date gives pause for thought. I'm not an expert on any type of dress, never mind paintings including it, but have come across examples of nobles choosing to be painted in dress of previous generations. As such I'm not overwhelmingly in favour of either keeping or removing the image; both may have their arguments. With the understanding that the portrait may be Honywood but may equally be not, would a compromise of moving it to the main body of the article with the inclusion of a caption noting the confusion work? Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. I'll leave you to write the explaining caption on the main body, if that's no issue. Until we meet again! Dabberoni15 (talk) 22:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia Structure
Hey so i noticed that the Battle of Lahore (1748) went from a B class to a start class as seen here.Do you have any tips on how to make the structure of the article better?

Thanks. Twarikh e Khalsa (talk) 20:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, I think my main point of concern was the length of the lede. It's far too short for a 1,000 word article. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

British campaign in the Caribbean
On my to do list for some time, I eventually got round to starting the article, when I noticed your article on William Grinfield. My intention was to create an article about the 1803 attacks on St Lucia, Tobago and the Dutch colonies in South America but much of what I had to say is already in Grinfield's article. I am now wondering whether there's enough for a separate article. Do you have any thoughts on that? --Ykraps (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I think there's certainly enough for a separate article. I've now mentioned the campaign in, I think, three articles: Grinfield, Charles Richardson (Royal Navy officer), and York Light Infantry Volunteers. I covered the campaign in quite a lot of detail for Grinfield because he was in command of it, but I expect there's more to be found from the Dutch/French side of things at least. You might think about updating West Indies campaign 1803–1810 too, because that doesn't even mention the campaigns before 1806, despite what the title promises! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)


 * In that case, I'll continue and see how it develops. Yes, I noticed West Indies campaign 1803–1810 doesn't mention it at all, and thought about adding it there but I think putting a separate article together first is the way to go. --Ykraps (talk) 20:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Do you have any sources on the invasion of St Lucia that talk about the role of sailors and marines under Benjamin Hallowell Carew stationed at Gros Islet? According to the Gazette, they were there to "...prevent supplies being thrown into Pigeon Island" [] Whatever that means. --Ykraps (talk) 07:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)


 * A brief check doesn't bring up anything apart from reproductions of that Gazette letter, and then similar ones for Tobago afterwards. Will have a better look later today. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Nope, haven't found anything else. Amazingly the modern Death Before Glory: The British Soldier in the West Indies in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars 1793-1815 doesn't even mention the campaign! Nelson's Yankee Captain, a biography of Hallowell, might discuss the event but I can't discover a way to access the book without buying a hard copy. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I've checked Halowell's entry in the ODNB but that yields nothing. I am assuming there was a French garrison at Fort Rodney and the point was to prevent them combining with the force at Morne Fortunee but I can only find the Gazette's vague description of events. If you find anything in the future, do let me know, or just add a bit yourself of course. When was your copy of Howard's book published? Mine was 2015, I think, and discusses the campaign from p.117. --Ykraps (talk) 07:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I have the same edition, I must plead tiredness for my mistake. You're entirely correct! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:32, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I've come across the first non-Gazette reproduction reference to Gros Islet: Howard, 2015, p. 118: "Diseases had decimated the French. General Nogues had scarcely 160 men of which 50 had been detached to Gros Islet." Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Well now it's my turn to plead tiredness. I read that passage several days ago, then couldn't remember where I saw it. --Ykraps (talk) 05:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Do say if there's any particular assistance I can give with the article as you write it - always happy to help. As a side note, while going over these sources I've discovered an entirely new work on Grinfield and his wider career which I'll be adding to his article shortly! Hitting myself for missing it the first time around, but you can take the credit for providing the impetus for the second look! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 00:13, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I don't have the same quantity of sources for troop movements as I do for naval operations so I'm sure they'll be plenty for you to add after I'm done. I notice you cite and  in Grinfield's artice, are they available on line somewhere? --Ykraps (talk) 09:15, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Reviewing your talk page, I see you had a bit of an issue a few months back. Hope it's all okay now. Wikipedia is supposed to be fun but, as we all know, it can be a toxic environment so it's not healthy to spend too much time here. Take frequent breaks and avoid engaging with dickheads is my advice. --Ykraps (talk) 09:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, life has improved dramatically for me since that moment. It wasn't actually Wikipedia related - it's difficult to come across the more toxic elements of the community while editing the niche of Napoleonic history! Fortescue can be accessed here and Southey here. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:44, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * My advice works for real life too. Good to know you're okay now and thanks for the links. --Ykraps (talk) 07:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

I think I'm about finished with this article but before I release it into the wild, do you have any thoughts about the title? --Ykraps (talk) 06:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I think the title works. It's not a divisive area, so if something better comes up it wouldn't be a problem to change. I notice that you're now working on the British invasion of Surinam (does it need the year disambiguation?), and thought I'd just point out that Battle of Suriname also exists. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:20, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely happy with the title but I can't think of anything better. As you say though, it can be easily moved later. Thanks for pointing out that article before I'd gone too far. I searched for Surinam and couldn't find anything. I guess I'll just add to the existing article then. :) --Ykraps (talk) 17:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lord Adolphus FitzClarence
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lord Adolphus FitzClarence you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 14:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lord Adolphus FitzClarence
The article Lord Adolphus FitzClarence you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lord Adolphus FitzClarence and Talk:Lord Adolphus FitzClarence/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Question from Aloo Denish (10:38, 30 April 2023)
Thanks Pickersgill-Cunliffe, I look forward to positive interaction with you as you guide through stages of perfecting my editing skills. Again, thanks immensely for offering to be my mentor --Aloo Denish (talk) 10:38, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lord Adolphus FitzClarence
The article Lord Adolphus FitzClarence you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lord Adolphus FitzClarence for comments about the article, and Talk:Lord Adolphus FitzClarence/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Lord Adolphus Fitzclarence contest entry
I have checked your contest entry at the Military History Project for the subject article. It appears to me that the article was promoted this month from start to GA (with B in between), rather than from C to GA. This would make the total points 10 rather than 8. I have noted in the edit summary that I have not confirmed the current entry because it appears to have this inconsistency and should be corrected. Do you concur or have I missed something? If you will change it, I (or perhaps someone else) will confirm it late today (Monday) or early tomorrow. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 08:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, per this diff the article was rated by MILHIST as C before the GA reviewer updated the article to B on 24 April. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:08, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I did miss something. I saw the two other start diffs and did not look closely enough to see the C for MILHIST rating. This will help me to remember to be sure to look closely at all ratings by all projects and in particular the right one. Donner60 (talk) 06:19, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Francis Slater Rebow
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Francis Slater Rebow you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Henry de Hinuber
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Henry de Hinuber you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You might not have noticed by I've responded to your changes on both of your British general nom's. I think that each only has one thing that still requires work.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Henry Talbot of Templeogue
Dear Pickersgill-Cunliffe, thank you for renaming Henry Sir Talbot of Templeogue back to Henry Talbot of Templeogue. This was my fault. I think this has happened to me before, but I do not remember at which occasion. Some friendly and experienced Wikipedian corrected me. Just like you. I think I should really learn my lesson. I spent some time this morning (again) on trying to find where this rule is written down (not easy to find) and finally got it: WP:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility) (a guideline) under the heading of "British nobility" and thereunder "3. Baronets" or "4. Titles of Knighthood". British nobility has three shortcuts: WP:NCBRITPEER, WP:NCPEER and WP:OBE. Baronets and knights are no peers so we stay with WP:OBE. What does this stand for? Is it suitable? If not, could a shortcut for this case be added? The shortcut WP:BARONET is already taken and points to "Articles on baronets" in WP:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage where some advice is given that does, however, not have guideline status. So perhaps WP:NCBARONET, or WP:NCBT? With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 09:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi I'm honestly not sure what the OBE shortcut means. Obviously it can stand for Order of the British Empire/Officer of the British Empire, but I don't know what relevance that would have for the royalty/nobility guidelines. I think either of those suggested shortcuts would work, the former probably more than the latter. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:42, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Question from User19901234 (08:54, 14 May 2023)
Hi,

I have a suggested edit for Hull City. There is a table which shows current roles at the club with Jon Beale holding the Academy and Community role. This is outdated and needs updating as below Academy Manager Richard Naylor Community Chief Executive Officer Catherine Bishop.

However, I cannot seem to suggest the edit?

Thanks. --User19901234 (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! In my slowness to reply to your question you've succeeded in posting your request yourself! If you have any further questions, feel free to ask. I note that if you wait another two days and make eight edits you'll be able to edit the page in question yourself. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Francis Slater Rebow
The article Francis Slater Rebow you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Francis Slater Rebow for comments about the article, and Talk:Francis Slater Rebow/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Henry de Hinuber
The article Henry de Hinuber you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Henry de Hinuber for comments about the article, and Talk:Henry de Hinuber/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

french campaign on Egypt
soo i cite the book ? Jamalie7 (talk) 18:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! When making edits to articles editors should ensure that the content they are adding is verifiable. For this you need to cite your additions to reliable sources. This helps others identify that the information you are adding is notable and correct. A good place to start when learning about referencing your additions on Wikipedia is here. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Question from Umarwaseemwrites (16:56, 30 May 2023)
Hi sir, i am a writer and love to do research on multiple topics i want to spared that knowledge by publishing here it will make me learn wikipedia also would you have a specific time to reply if i may know --Umarwaseemwrites (talk) 16:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome! You might find Help:Introduction a useful place to start learning about Wikipedia and how you can contribute. If you have any particular questions, feel free to ask me! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Sir i want to know that when an article says "This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it"
 * what is the best way to add the information and references to validate this information Umarwaseemwrites (talk) 21:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * An article with the banner you mention might have any variety of issues, including lacking references as you say. If you're looking for new sources then Google Scholar is a good place to search that will almost certainly only provide reliable sources. If you're looking for a particular book then Internet Archive is often a nice place to start. If you're looking to add references to existing text then you might find ProveIt useful. This is an addon you can find in the Gadgets section of Preferences that helps you add and cite references in articles. When it comes to adding any content or references, please be bold! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much, it is so useful now one last question so that i can be a bit confident, question is below:
 * I have seen many business and companies pages on Wikipedia but not every company has a page so what is the difference and what makes a business qualified for being on Wikipedia ? and it can be created or wikipedia chooses by automatic ? Umarwaseemwrites (talk) 17:54, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Every page on Wikipedia had to pass the same basic notability guidelines. For businesses and companies in particular you might find it useful to read the notability guidelines for organisations and businesses here. That page comprehensively explains how a topic becomes notable enough for a Wikipedia article, and honestly it's probably better if you read that than have me haphazardly explain it! I will note that no topic is ever automatically notable: Each subject must be individually notable as the aforementioned pages explain. You should not try and create a page for a subject just because you believe they should have one, or because there are extant pages for other similar subjects. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * a big thanks for explaining let me read it understand it then ask you further questions if need be Umarwaseemwrites (talk) 18:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Question from Emagiven (10:42, 1 June 2023)
Hello How're doing I believe we shall keep in touch --Emagiven (talk) 10:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Feel free to ask me questions here. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Coleman Yellott
Hello, I note this edit suggests some information is not in the body that is in the infobox. What in particular are you referencing as missing? --Engineerchange (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi I didn't check every part of the infobox, so you may want to, but in this instance was referring to the mention of Towson, Maryland. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Good catch, I've fixed that error. I imagine it was a copypaste mistake. Cheers, --Engineerchange (talk) 13:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

In appreciation
Thanks very much, Gog. Happy to be of assistance. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Manilla (1809)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Manilla (1809) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:42, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for participating in the RAMM Volunteer Wiki Project
Hi @Pickersgill-Cunliffe! Just a note to say thank you for your participation in our work at the Royal Albert Memorial Museum. You are a Wiki star: keep up the good work! EriedgenArc (talk) 10:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

the French campaign on egypt and Syria
found a other source that also state Tunisia: Commandeering Empires: Egypt, Tripoli, and Tunis in the Age of Commandeering Empires: Egypt, Tripoli, and Tunis in the Age of Revolution, 1774-1835 Revolution, 1774-1835 from page 99 to page 109 Jamalie7 (talk) 17:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Question from Lyscheve (20:52, 16 June 2023)
Why is someone trying to delete my page? --Lyscheve (talk) 20:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, you've only logged one edit, and that was this question, so I'm afraid I can't help you there. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Best account of the Battle of Trafalgar?
I just got Winfield's new book on Spanish ships in the hopes that it would cover the Spanish ships converted to steam, but no joy. Thinking to make some use of my purchase, I'm contemplating doing GA-level articles on the Spanish ships that fought at Trafalgar if I can get enough quality sources covering their actions during the battle. Might you be able to suggest some books on the battle that might be of use? Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The literature on Trafalgar is vast. Some books like to focus on Nelson and the British to the detriment of the Franco-Spanish fleet, and most recommendations would probably be better individually tailored to each vessel. That said, I've found the following as good places to start when placing a ship in her place at Trafalgar:
 * - Provides a nice overview of the battle (and a lot of Nelson bumf), and also dedicates a page each to every vessel at the battle, tracking its movements, fate, armament, history, etc.
 * - Similar scope/type of detail.
 * - Good modern narrative of the battle, I used it frequently for James Nicoll Morris.
 * Don't completely bypass some of the older sources either. These can be useful:
 * I expect there will be good French/Spanish sources out there too but I haven't personally come across or used any of them. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll follow up on these.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I expect there will be good French/Spanish sources out there too but I haven't personally come across or used any of them. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll follow up on these.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Lord Adolphus FitzClarence
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Question from CuriousEditor1902 (07:01, 22 June 2023)
Dear My Mentor,

Please tell me how to publish a new article on Wikipedia, surely appreciate any help, thank you --CuriousEditor1902 (talk) 07:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! Your first port of call should be this introductory page here. Have a read of it, but don't hesitate to ask me if you have any queries about it! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:12, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

FAC Nom
Hi Pickersgill-Cunliffe, Have you abandoned your nomination at Featured article candidates/Maurice Suckling/archive1? I think it's a great pity if you have. To be clear, I am not intending to oppose on the comma issue but there are a few points I've raised which I think are valid and it would be interesting to hear your thoughts. All the best --Ykraps (talk) 08:33, 25 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Oops, haven't abandoned at all! I work ever stranger hours right now and was completely unaware that it had been five days since your comments. I'll get on it ASAP. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 08:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)


 * As long as I know, there's no rush. Just pleased to hear you haven't given up on it. --Ykraps (talk) 08:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * On a different note I see you're now working on Serapis. I know you've got Roebuck herself as one of your magnum opuses, but feel free to steal anything you like from Resistance if you feel the need! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I never did Latin so had to look that one up. I even went as far as checking it wasn't magnum opi. :) --Ykraps (talk) 10:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Manilla (1809)
The article HMS Manilla (1809) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Manilla (1809) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Manilla (1809)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert Hughes (Royal Navy officer, died 1729)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert Hughes (Royal Navy officer, died 1729) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 23:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Antonio Dini
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)


 * All Zawed! I only reviewed it. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 00:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Francis Slater Rebow
Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert Hughes (Royal Navy officer, died 1729)
The article Robert Hughes (Royal Navy officer, died 1729) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert Hughes (Royal Navy officer, died 1729) for comments about the article, and Talk:Robert Hughes (Royal Navy officer, died 1729)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Henry de Hinuber
RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Question from Tradidart (13:59, 24 July 2023)
Hi Pickersgill-Cunliffe, I'm new to the editing thing on Wikipedia but have contributed to other wikis in my distant past. At the moment, I'm interested in getting input on creating a new page defining the term detriticulture ( a subset of permaculture... ). Is there anything to be aware/respectful of when creating new pages as newbie. Thanks! --Tradidart (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Ah... I see from reading WP:1ST that I should avoid this particular contribution as I am involved in coining the term. It is a good excise in realizing how topics become relevant for inclusion. Aside becoming familiar with from the contents of WP:1ST, is there any other advice you'd give a new contributor/editor. Tradidart (talk) 14:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! You may find this introduction a useful place to start your journey. For your particular circumstance you might wish to read through the conflict of interest guidelines too. I'll always suggest to a new editor that they start small in their contributions; go to pages you find interesting or have some knowledge of and seek out spelling errors, uncited material, vandalism, etc, and fix it up. Doing these minor but useful tasks can help a new editor get used to making changes to pages, and further their understanding of what makes up a good Wikipedia article before they take on larger projects.
 * Please feel free to ask me any more specific questions you have down the line. I'll be happy to help! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Question from Nayeem siddiqui (12:26, 26 July 2023)
hello my name is Nayeem i am from I like to know everything about wikipedia, like to edit and stuff. I all way want to be a editor for wikipedia I am glad to be part of the community --Nayeem siddiqui (talk) 12:26, 26 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Welcome to Wikipedia! Your best plan to get started is at Help:Getting started. Feel free to ask me any follow-up questions! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:53, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Henry Procter (British Army officer)
Hello Pickersgill-Cunliffe, since you edited the article earlier this month, I am reaching out to you because I came across ''CHARGES EXHIBITED AGAINST MAJOR GENERAL HENRY PROCTOR, LIEUT. COL. OF THE 41st REGIMENT OF FOOT, VIZ ; FIRST CHARGE.

The information, more specifically the dates of birth and death: Procter, Henry Adolphus, 1787-1859 are different, strange... Lotje (talk) 05:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi! Henry Patrick Procter was indeed born in about 1763 (see here). The author of this defence of him is written by Henry Adolphus Procter, another officer serving in Canada at the time. As this explains, the two Procters have been confused before, both eventually becoming major-generals, but they are different people. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:09, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you ever so much Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Lotje (talk) 08:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andrew Pilkington
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andrew Pilkington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kges1901 -- Kges1901 (talk) 22:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andrew Pilkington
The article Andrew Pilkington you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Andrew Pilkington and Talk:Andrew Pilkington/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kges1901 -- Kges1901 (talk) 00:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andrew Pilkington
The article Andrew Pilkington you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andrew Pilkington for comments about the article, and Talk:Andrew Pilkington/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kges1901 -- Kges1901 (talk) 14:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sir Richard Hughes, 1st Baronet
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sir Richard Hughes, 1st Baronet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stafford Lightburne
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stafford Lightburne you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

History of military logistics
Could I trouble you for a review of History of military logistics at WikiProject Military history/Assessment/History of military logistics? You don't have to review the whole thing, but you are more knowledgeable about the early modern era than I am. Hawkeye7  (discuss)  09:21, 19 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Oops, I missed this! Happy to take a look at the part of the article my interests align with. Will try and get some comments down in the next four days; feel free to pester me If you haven't heard from me in a week. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 00:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stafford Lightburne
The article Stafford Lightburne you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stafford Lightburne and Talk:Stafford Lightburne/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sir Richard Hughes, 1st Baronet
The article Sir Richard Hughes, 1st Baronet you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sir Richard Hughes, 1st Baronet for comments about the article, and Talk:Sir Richard Hughes, 1st Baronet/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stafford Lightburne
The article Stafford Lightburne you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stafford Lightburne for comments about the article, and Talk:Stafford Lightburne/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the August 2023 GAN backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Nkepeshi Ernest on User:Nkepeshi Ernest (19:37, 8 September 2023)
Hello, how can you edite an unfinished pegs --Nkepeshi Ernest (talk) 19:37, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm not entirely sure what you're asking about, as you haven't made an attempt to edit any such page. I suggest you start your journey by utilising Help:Getting started. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Tfangus21 on Eldora Speedway (00:31, 10 September 2023)
How do you lock a page from edits --Tfangus21 (talk) 00:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi! You might find Protection policy useful. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:58, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Nāmākēhā
Hello, I just wanted to ask what does B5 Supporting materials mean and what can be done to address that. Thanks. KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Mackie the Mapacha (20:17, 22 September 2023)
Hello, how can I create a new page? --Mackie the Mapacha (talk) 20:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry my sister wrote it Mackie the Mapacha (talk) 20:20, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Alexasigfred on Hildebrandslied (15:00, 26 September 2023)
Hello --Alexasigfred (talk) 15:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Question from Sssaaraa (06:36, 2 October 2023)
Sir since I have had made more than 3000 edits and I have also created and edited various useful pages. Can I get any administrator position like rollbacker or revert edit or something like that. --Sssaaraa (talk) 06:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for joining us for our Devon in Red Wikithon!
Thank you so much for joining us on Thursday 21st September for our Wiki editing workshop: we appreciate your attendance very much.

If you'd like to continue your Wiki journey, why not join our RAMM-Wiki Google group? All you need is an email address.

We'd love to see you there as part of our supportive community of practice, to share upcoming events and Wiki opportunities.

Happy editing! EriedgenArc (talk) 15:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Blanche (1800)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Blanche (1800) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

The Nile and me, apparently
Hey, just a heads up, but I noticed the edit at the Battle of the Nile - it’s in reference to this discussion. Parsecboy (talk) 18:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for making me aware. I've made the necessary change including a Manning & Walker reference. Not sure if you have access to a full edition; the Canopus entry is: "'An ancient Egyptian city. The name was chosen by Nelson for the Franklin, one of his prizes at The Nile.'" Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Nope, I just get snippet view unfortunately. Thanks for the full reference! Parsecboy (talk) 20:39, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from SAHILKHAN0009 (08:59, 16 October 2023)
hello --SAHILKHAN0009 (talk) 08:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from WikiDeveloperOfficialUSA (09:45, 16 October 2023)
Hello, Pickersgill-Cunliffe! Could you please help me with the task of updating wiki pages, replacing outdated information with current information? --WikiDeveloperOfficialUSA (talk) 09:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Japanese gods
Hello mr Pickersgill-Cunliffe please im telling you the truth about those Japanese gods Ive Read them from other reliable sources. 2A02:586:1E33:AA51:CD90:EC99:87E2:9F53 (talk) 12:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * See user talk:Akaora Hy Brasil (talk) 12:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Stag (1812)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Stag (1812) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

I owe you an apology.
I know how you feel about my edits, but to be honest, I was about to correct my mistakes. 2600:387:15:1F33:0:0:0:8 (talk) 18:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Blanche (1800)
The article HMS Blanche (1800) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Blanche (1800) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Blanche (1800)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Question from MDKAMAL21 (19:27, 26 October 2023)
help me please active my account --MDKAMAL21 (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * You already have an account! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Isreal war
can I help resolve media Isreal war through explaining history and covid 19 world pendamic the best. I am iso 20022 41.13.64.223 (talk) 19:39, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

I want to go foreign country
I’m Ajmal and I’m student I want to complete my education in USA or 🇬🇧 it’s my dream I live in Afghanistan AjmalEsmat (talk) 15:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello! This is Wikipedia, and I am a Wikipedia editor. I cannot assist you in moving countries. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Edwin H. Webster talk page
Hello, on this edit, you suggest that details in the infobox are not in the body of the article. I found every detail was included in the body (years of service, party affiliation, alma mater, birth and death date/place, etc.), with one exception (the predecessor and successor), which I think is kind of standard. Are there specific details you found missing in the body? --Engineerchange (talk) 15:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Looks like this one is on me! Think I misread the resting place entry. Feel free to update B1! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries, made the change! Cheers, --Engineerchange (talk) 15:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Altafdshaikh (07:00, 2 November 2023)
Hello

I wanted to change my user name.

Please can you help me. --Altafdshaikh (talk) 07:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * You'll find this page useful. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Carpetdoor12 (20:29, 2 November 2023)
hvordan du det? :-) --Carpetdoor12 (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Sayhiguy (19:17, 4 November 2023)
Hello!!! Im new to wiki, as a contributor, and would like to publish an article this fall... but dont see the sandbox to begin and Im told I need to edit some other pages first? Thanks for any suggestions! Maria --Sayhiguy (talk) 19:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * It looks like you might be attempting to promote a product you have a connection to. I would advise having a read of what Wikipedia is not before you go any further. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Saldanha (1809)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Saldanha (1809) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 04:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Pallas (1816)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Pallas (1816) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 08:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Chayagrahan (05:29, 6 November 2023)
How to publish an article, which is in my userpage --Chayagrahan (talk) 05:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)


 * New editors can use the articles for creation system to publish their articles. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Pickersgill-Cunliffe. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Guerillero Parlez Moi 21:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only . Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
 * Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

Question from 244thepresident (09:27, 9 November 2023)
Hi, can i add a page to wikipedia? --244thepresident (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * You can! This page is a good place to start. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Saldanha (1809)
The article HMS Saldanha (1809) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Saldanha (1809) and Talk:HMS Saldanha (1809)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 22:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Altafdshaikh (16:11, 10 November 2023)
Hello --Altafdshaikh (talk) 16:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

HMS Saldahna
Congrats on the GA. Cheers, Acad Ronin (talk) 22:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I have a very long-term goal to get all the Apollo class to that level. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Saldanha (1809)
The article HMS Saldanha (1809) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Saldanha (1809) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Saldanha (1809)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Vestal (1777)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Vestal (1777) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ykraps -- Ykraps (talk) 10:23, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Colliewood (19:44, 11 November 2023)
Hello. I noticed that a number of citations lead to dead websites or pay-walled articles / papers is it against the rules to change these to Internetarchive.com pages instead? --Colliewood (talk) 19:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! You're totally allowed to do that. You'll find this a useful place to learn more. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit on Browning, Montana (notable people)
The link used was to a PBS documentary hosted on YouTube. I used the YT link because sometimes PBS links are retired or otherwise become broken. The YT link seemed more permanent. 2603:8000:2942:4A00:B80C:8C7:1195:4E0E (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit on Browning, Montana page, notable people
The link I included was for a PBS documentary hosted on YouTube. I used it instead of the PBS link, because sometimes PBS will retire a video without notice. 2603:8000:2942:4A00:B80C:8C7:1195:4E0E (talk) 21:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Vestal (1777)
The article HMS Vestal (1777) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Vestal (1777) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Vestal (1777)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ykraps -- Ykraps (talk) 15:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Pallas (1816)
The article HMS Pallas (1816) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Pallas (1816) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Pallas (1816)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 08:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Stag (1812)
The article HMS Stag (1812) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Stag (1812) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Stag (1812)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Researchassistant16 (14:39, 19 November 2023)
Hello,

Thank you very much for your message!

I'm about to publish my first article. The page will be about a deceased Finnish athlete who also had a history as a WW2 war hero. World Championship records are in English. However, many books and articles detailing him are in Finnish. I'm bilingual, making the research easier even without Google Translate. Do you have recommendations on how best to cater to the English-speaking audience while quoting sources that are in Finnish? --Researchassistant16 (talk) 14:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! As this is the English Wikipedia I would caution against adding quotations in the article if they're going to be in a foreign language. If you want to quote a translated version then that works, but obviously depends on whether the translation is accurate! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * So the best practice would be to state the facts like score, ranking, or place referencing the foreign language source without translating unless such translation is unambiguous (quoting a term with commonly accepted translation) or would be available in Wikipedia otherwise (like military rank or translation of an award)? Researchassistant16 (talk) 15:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * References, e.g. the cite book template, have a "trans-title=" function where you can provide both the original name/title of the source and a translated version. You may want to get in touch with, an editor who also works in the Finnish WW2 area. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Being new to the platform, I have an elementary question regarding etiquette: what is the correct way reaching out to Ljleppan? He might be able to help me quoting the key battles he participate correctly. I am facing challenges in finding corresponding information on Wikipedia for all of these battles. (Virolahti, Ino, Aleksandrowska, Kivennapa, Heinjoki, Kääntymä, Juustila and Kiviniemi). I would assume some might be more commonly known by their Russian names. Researchassistant16 (talk) 17:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Leave them a message on their talk page here. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * See above. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Question from Randomarticlepublisher (05:33, 20 November 2023)
Hi,i don't know how to delete images in wiki pedia (i am in mobile phone) can you help me with this? --Randomarticlepublisher (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Edit the article like you would any other and remove the text that inputs the image. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Origin of Gupta Empire
hello sir, please add the Gupta Empire origin. " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
 * Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Endymion (1779)
The article HMS Endymion (1779) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Endymion (1779) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Endymion (1779)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 00:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Anuragraju (07:39, 16 December 2023)
Hello-I have many new ideas and which I want to share on Wikipedia --Anuragraju (talk) 07:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks for your hard work!

Timeandenergy 21:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC) 

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Experiment (1784)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Experiment (1784) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Experiment (1784)
The article HMS Experiment (1784) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Experiment (1784) and Talk:HMS Experiment (1784)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 20:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Experiment (1784)
The article HMS Experiment (1784) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Experiment (1784) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Experiment (1784)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 21:44, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 13 May 1779
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Action of 13 May 1779 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 22:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

GA review
Hey mate, sorry to leap over the top of you for the GA review for USS John P. Jackson. So our reviewing stats stack up, if you initiate the review on CSS New Orleans, I will do the substantive review of that one. I would have selected it for review had I known that USS John P. Jackson was under review. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 04:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Rajoub570 (11:32, 27 December 2023)
Hi, I am writing to request your assistance in adding a footnote to the information I have added to the Wikipedia article on Al-Qadi Abd al-Jabbar. The footnote I would like to add is:Subki, Tabaqat al-Shafi'iyah: Page 220 Thank you R --Rajoub570 (talk) 11:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Euphrates (1813)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Euphrates (1813) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Euphrates (1813)
The article HMS Euphrates (1813) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Euphrates (1813) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Euphrates (1813)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 02:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from Swilliams1968 (17:33, 30 December 2023)
How do I create a new page? --Swilliams1968 (talk) 17:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, welcome to Wikipedia! This page is a good place to start. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year 2023
Thanks, Hawkeye! Here's to another productive year of Milhist. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 01:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Action of 13 May 1779
The article Action of 13 May 1779 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Action of 13 May 1779 for comments about the article, and Talk:Action of 13 May 1779/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Revert on User talk:Gog the Mild
Was this a misclick? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:04, 7 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Oops, it certainly was! I haven't got my mouse with me right now, and apparently navigating my watchlist with the trackpad is...fraught with hazards. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:51, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

TFA
Just checking that you are aware of this: Today's featured article/requests/Charles Richardson (Royal Navy officer). Gog the Mild (talk) 12:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I wasn't aware. I haven't had a TFA before; is there anything in particular that I'm required to do in advance? Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Nope. Although you will probably want to run your eye over the blurb. Feel free to make changes, bearing in mind the character limit (925-1,025 including spaces). Anything you're not sure about, any queries, if need advice, or if you would just like someone to run an eye over something, post it here. (Create a new section.) And congratulations. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposal to Separate ThinkFree Office from Hancom Office
Hello Pickersgill-Cunliffe

Recently, I noticed that the editing history of Thinkfree Office has been merged back into Hancom Office pages.

I'd like to discuss the possibility of separating the ThinkFree Office entry from the Hancom Office page. Here are the key points:


 * Corporate Independence: ThinkFree Inc. was spun off from Hancom in November 2023 and operates independently. An updated Wikipedia entry would reflect this change accurately. More details can be found in this ZDNet Korea article.
 * Product Distinction: ThinkFree Office consists of word processing, spreadsheet, and presentation tools, making it a distinct product from Hancom Office in both composition and offerings.
 * Brand Identity: Maintaining a distinct entry for ThinkFree Office would help in preserving its unique brand identity.

I believe your insight would be crucial in ensuring the precision of this update. Could we start a discussion on this to explore the best way forward? Thanks for considering this change. Longtailmonkey (talk) 07:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)