User talk:Picklespitlizyr

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) Hello, Picklespitlizyr, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Learn from others
 * Be kind to others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us a bit about yourself
 * Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes ( ~ ); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 22:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Templates, Images, & Conduct on Wikipedia
Picklespiltizyr, There are number of disruptive edit behaviors you are engaging in: I see that you are a new editor, so I won't hold your disruptive edits against you. Please review Manual of Style and Images. Failure to follow Wikipedia guidelines, such as reverting edits without cause or inappropriate removal of content, will result in my opening an arbitration case against you and possible a motion to block. If you need any help, please reach out to my talk page. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Images are not added to templates "just to look nice". They have to have to be relevant, descriptive, and representative of the topic at hand. The flag of a Spanish colonial flag and one church in Santo Domingo is NOT representative of Hispanic architecture across the world.
 * Similarly, captions to images must be descriptive and have a point. They are not opportunities for poetic phrasing.
 * Templates are meant to placed ONLY on pages DIRECTLY relevant to their subject matter. You cannot add the Spanish Colonial architecture template to cities as a whole, that is not its purpose. It is meant for articles on architecture, including architectural styles, building articles, or other directly relevant subjects.

Note
You may find this to be of your interest:. My regards.--Asqueladd (talk) 21:07, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Regarding this "odd" edit, read this carefully: WP:WIKIHOUNDING, because this is the last time I am going to warn you.--Asqueladd (talk) 23:58, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to List of World Heritage Sites in Mexico you included material from a webpages that are available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 12:39, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 18:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Which user is chasing you? Also, its pretty hard for a "severe-corrupt sysop" to read edit summaries when you don't provide any. Of your last 50 edits, a mere 10 had summaries. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 18:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure what the edits you've linked are supposed to show? The first shows you removing valid templates, and not replacing them with a reference. The second shows you just changing some images. I'm not seeing admin corruption. You were editing disruptively, by removing valid content and sources. Thus, you were given a short block to stop your disruption. If you understand why your edits were disruptive, explain and you will be unblocked. But claiming admin abuse is not gonna get you very far. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 18:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Your changes to Copper Canyon are still not a net improvement. Please explain what you're trying to do—and especially why you're removing maintenance tags without fixing the problems they identify. —C.Fred (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, please focus on the article itself. This talk page message could easily be interpreted as a personal attack. —C.Fred (talk) 01:34, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * ... personal attack? --Picklespitlizyr (talk) 01:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * And the one you left at my user talk page. This matter has now been referred to WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. —C.Fred (talk) 01:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

permalink to ANI thread. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 03:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Your recent editing history at Denmark shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. creffett (talk) 02:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * Personal attacks based on an editor's nationality are unacceptable. You cannot edit war. You cannot repeatedly remove sourced content and legitimate maintenance tags without gaining consensus. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  02:38, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

"Mexiquense"
That's relevant how? Is that the typical Mexican bullshit? © Tb hotch ™ (en-3). 04:40, 5 June 2020 (UTC)