User talk:Picoz~enwiki

Welcome
Hello, Picoz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Lufthansa have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 17:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ( Hohum  @ ) 22:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hotchkiss H35 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 12:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Catanduanes Bleeding-heart


A tag has been placed on Catanduanes Bleeding-heart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Denniss (talk) 18:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Supermarine Type 553


A tag has been placed on Supermarine Type 553, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

copied off unsourced wikia article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Avono♂ (talk) 15:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Supermarine Type 324


A tag has been placed on Supermarine Type 324 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Avono♂ (talk) 16:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Referencing
Especially for an unbuilt design, you need to provide reliable independent sources WP:RS. I've declined the speedy deletion as this doesn't meet the criterion of 'made-up' (which is mainly for drinking games, new words that only three people use, and religions where lampposts are the angels of the Almighty Searchlight in the Sky. In other words, made up and no evidence whatever. I've found evidence that this isn't just made up, but it needs to be proved in better sources than some I've looked at. Over to you... If it gets tagged Proposed Deletion or Articles for Deletion, you'll have a week to sort it - or at least prove that it's real and notable even if the article isn't finished. And, at AfD, people do research things and are very happy to find they're wrong in the face of good evidence. All articles on Wikipedia are supposed to be referenced - some slip through but get caught later. Good luck. Peridon (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * PS An article of mine is about an abandoned venture - the Rover Scarab. We do make some allowance for the time period when assessing RS. Peridon (talk) 18:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Supermarine Type 553


A tag has been placed on Supermarine Type 553 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Avono♂ (talk) 18:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Supermarine Type 553, you may be blocked from editing. Avono♂ (talk) 18:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Messerschmitt Me 334 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Messerschmitt Me 334 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Messerschmitt Me 334 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Petebutt (talk) 01:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Please sdesist from writing nonsense articles--Petebutt (talk) 01:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Messerschmitt Me 334, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Avono♂ (talk) 11:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Supermarine Type 324
A better title and subjest string might be Air Ministry specification F.18/37, this would cover all the various designs submitted.--Petebutt (talk) 14:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Picoz. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Picoz~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bf 165 Banana Bomber.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bf 165 Banana Bomber.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)