User talk:Picperson

August 2009
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Siawase (talk) 16:43, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Siawase (talk) 16:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:The-red-jumpsuit-apparatus.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The-red-jumpsuit-apparatus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Red+jumpsuit+apparatus.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Red+jumpsuit+apparatus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Tables
Good to see you taking an interest in film articles but I must encourage you not to use tables for Cast and character lists. Tables are best used for blocks of data that will be presented as multiple columns and made sortable. I avoid tables unless there are two strong values readers might want to sort against, so although some editors would use a table for the films an actor has made over the years I would not recommend it since the years are the only real interesting value to sort against in that situation. (The web has a long bad history of using Tables for layout a rule too often ignored and stylesheets have only really caught on recently.) For a Cast list a list is a better. If you look at some of the film articles that have been rated as Good Article (GA) or Featured Article (FA) you will probably see that the Cast list gradually gets expanded to include casting or character information. Putting the cast list as a table only makes editor more cluttered and discourages other editors from expanding and including additional information in the sections. -- Horkana (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)