User talk:Pictogramfanzine

April 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Beatriz colomina, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Cheers, Jonomacdrones  (talk)  22:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

as mentioned on the article talk page
speedy is only appropriate for articles out subject with no claim to notability whatsoever, and so was totally inappropriate. However, the article can nonetheless be proposed for deletion, and to avoid this : and, most important, giving some 3rd party sources. A website at a university etc. can be one, but it cannot be the only one. Book reviews are fine, or a newspaper stories. Print or web is OK, but not from a list or a blog.
 * say in the first sentence something to dramatically demonstrate notability, like "A.b. is an internationally-known professor of X at, winner of the XYZ prize and 10  honorary doctorates", or A.B. is a notable authority on Whatever. She is ... (etc) (whatever applies best). Use the exact wording I recommend, including either the word "notable" or "internationally-known" or "nationally-known"; do not use "famous" -- May sound silly, but that is what many people look for here.
 * listing all college degrees and positions, with university and year -- and putting the university names in double brackets  -- it makes a difference justy what position she has at her present university. dont rely on the CV link. summarize here, but do not copy the wording of the CV.
 * listing important awards, important memberships and offices held --a list is more readable than paragraphs
 * listing books published as formal references style: Author, title, Publisher, year ISBN if possible.
 * listing some major published papers, say how many total. Do not just link to Google, list the most prestigious papers. State the importance the journals are. Say how many other papers cited them.

These is, very  unfortunately, some prejudice against people from the academic world. I apologize for not having the time to help  personally. DGG 01:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Pictogramfanzine! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Beatriz Colomina -

Nomination of Beatriz Colomina for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beatriz Colomina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles_for_deletion/Beatriz_Colomina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.-- --Drowninginlimbo (talk) 11:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Also noting that this deletion comes after vandalism on the page Villa Müller by the same user who put the article up for deletion --Drowninginlimbo (talk) 11:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)