User talk:Pieboyjr

London
Your recent edit to London was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:51, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Local councillors
Hi. Just to let you know that I've labelled a few of your councillor articles for deletion. To quality as notable for the purposes of Wikipedia, living people should be the criteria at WP:BIO. With politicians, it is:
 * Political figures holding international, national or statewide/provincewide office or members of a national, state or provincial legislature.
 * Major local political figures who receive significant press coverage

Local councillors do not meet the first criterion and are unlikely to meet the second. To avoid deletion if the second does apply, the article should make clear how the criterion is met. Cheers. &mdash;Wh o  uk (talk) 14:55, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * PS: Short articles should be labelled as stubs so that other editors can find them to expand them. It's also useful to categorise articles. Happy editing! &mdash;Wh o  uk (talk) 14:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * See WP:Stub for details. In this case, you would add:
 * at the bottom of the article. By the way, to sign a message on a talk page, use four tildes: ~ . Cheers. &mdash;Wh o  uk (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * at the bottom of the article. By the way, to sign a message on a talk page, use four tildes: ~ . Cheers. &mdash;Wh o  uk (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry for not replying sooner - my browser crashed last time I tried. I'm not an administrator so I can't delete articles. They might not be deleted but redirected to the council article as most councillors do not warrant their own articles, as per the guideline at WP:BIO (there are lots of policies about what's considered notable for Wikipedia - you get used to them eventually!). Cheers. &mdash;Wh o  uk (talk) 18:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Your unexplained edit
Dear Pieboyjr, You didn't explain your last edit on this page, so I have revereted it. Myrtone

Football AID 9 July - 16 July
Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week. FA Premier League has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Image Tagging for Image:Youth voice fm.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Youth voice fm.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:NTCColLargeComp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NTCColLargeComp.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 02:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Tables
You seem to be having a lot of trouble editing the table on English football league system - can I help at all....? ChrisTheDude 13:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Stpauls.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stpauls.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

North Tyneside elections
Nice work on the different North Tyneside elections pages you have created. One point however on the North Tyneside Council election 2008 and I think in the intro of several of the other articles you have got that the whole council will be up for election. This is incorrect the whole council is up for election only about once a decade after the boundary changes which for North Tyneside was 2004. This link shows what elections will be taking place in 2008 which is only one third of the council. Davewild 08:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I have amended the intro on each of the articles - not sure if the wording is perfect, have a look what you think, but it seems to be about right. Davewild 17:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of North Tyneside Council election, 2012
A tag has been placed on North Tyneside Council election, 2012, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is unneccesary having this article 3 years before the event

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Smartse (talk) 15:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Stpaulswhitleybay.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stpaulswhitleybay.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 03:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Pieboyjr! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:09, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) John Harrison (politician) -
 * 2) Jim Conway -

AFD:David Charlton
I have today nominated the article that you created, David Charlton, for debate at WP:AFD. Can I suggest that you review the nomination and join the debate - Thank You! Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Diane Page


A tag has been placed on Diane Page requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Elusive Pete (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Janet Hunter


A tag has been placed on Janet Hunter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Elusive Pete (talk) 18:22, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Future local election articles
A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom about articles on future local council elections which you may be interested in. Davewild (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

File:St Paul Whitley Bay.gif missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:St Paul Whitley Bay.gif

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:27, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Barbara Stevens listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Barbara Stevens. Since you had some involvement with the Barbara Stevens redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Topperfalkon (talk) 23:44, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Joan Bell listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joan Bell. Since you had some involvement with the Joan Bell redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Topperfalkon (talk) 23:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Margaret Marshall (politician)


The article Margaret Marshall (politician) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable local politician, fails WP:POLITICIAN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Norma Redfearn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norma Redfearn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Norma Redfearn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 02:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:St Paul Whitley Bay.gif


The file File:St Paul Whitley Bay.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)