User talk:Pieceofmetalwork/Archives/2021/June

Largest employees
Hello.

We reference to Wikipedia entries all the time, don't we? If Wikipedia's information are incorrect, why do we link to other pages in our articles? The sources of those numbers are mentioned in those articles. I don't believe numbers from 2015 are accurate, either. Pro translator (talk) 20:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Pro translator, Wikipedia is not a source for Wikipedia. Linking to an article doesn't mean endorsing its content. Articles need to be independently sourced. Drmies (talk) 20:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mu Us Desert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yulin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stars Align (R3hab and Jolin Tsai song)


The article Stars Align (R3hab and Jolin Tsai song) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No notability, no RS cited."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Stars Align (R3hab and Jolin Tsai song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stars Align (R3hab and Jolin Tsai song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stars Align (R3hab and Jolin Tsai song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Community Sanctions Alert
— Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:06, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I haven't even edited that article, are you trying to intimidate me? Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 09:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * No, you got pinged because of edits to Id Kah Mosque (I tried to notify everybody who I had encountered that had expressed interest in the topic, broadly construed, after the community sanction discussion closed), though now that I'm looking at it a bit closer it appears that this notification wasn't strictly necessary as you've been mostly involved in an anti-vandalism/anti-edit war capacity. My apologies for any worry/stress that I may have accidentally caused. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

--Hipal (talk) 16:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi Pieceofmetalwork. Sorry my edit summary was unclear. It was a direct response to yours. You completely removed a reference because it cites another one used in the article. That's inappropriate, but you are correct that I could have been more descriptive with my edit summary. --Hipal (talk) 20:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for explaining. I removed it because not only were both cited, but both were used to cite the same statement. But since this is apparently allowed, I will leave it as is, however it can become a point when establishing notability of a claim. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 20:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Given that the relevant content is regularly in dispute, the more refs the better. We shouldn't need to be citing them in the lede, at least once it is stable for a significant period of time. --Hipal (talk) 21:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)