User talk:Pieeyed

Reasons for Rollback of helminthic therapy page edits:
Welcome to wikipedia and thanks for your edits to the Helminthic Therapy page.

However while you have expanded the contents and brought some welcome additions in terms of the recent legal developments you appear to be new to how some of your other edits should be handled.

For instance, links to references should be done in the style of the other references on the page. Your link to the external page of the FDA, the advisory regarding shipments of TSO, should be handled as a reference so that the link appears at the bottom of the page.

In addition some of what you wrote that appeared to be a useful addition to the page was written in such a way as to conceal the contents from readers of the page. In addition content on Wikipedia is meant to be neutral, that is having neither one nor another point of view (POV in Wikipedia lingo). Your assertion that the content appeared to make this therapy legal implies that you think it is illegal. You can only make such an assertion on Wikiepedia if you can support it with citations and indicate which jurisdiction those citations apply to. You might say for instance that according to the laws of the United States(citation here) and the European Union(citation here) helminthic therapy utilizing TSO is illegal. However it appears from the adivisory that the importation is illegal, so you should either limit your statement to that or provide additional citations to support the broader assertion.

You have also edited a lot of the previous references out of the content, or edited them in such a way as to reduce the total number of references while making some repeat. This is most apparent in the fourth paragraph that in your version contained four identical citations rather than the four unique originals. Citations are the lifeblood of Wikipedia and they should only be removed only if the content they originally applied to has been altered so that they no longer support the content they are associated with or if they never did support the content they are associated with.

I have rolled back the page to the version prior to your edits so you can make the edits you want in a way that conforms with Wikipedia guidelines., and that does not reduce the number of citations. The big issue was the damage to the citations, and restoring them one by one is way more tedious than reinserting your edits.

To generate citations easily you might find this tool useful, it really takes the drudgery out of it: Reference generator

You can learn how make the edits you want,  if it is not apparent from examining the existing content on the page, by accessing the tools on the left, under Toolbox and Interaction.

Assertions should always be supported by citations when available. or they will likely be deleted.