User talk:Pieman the second

Edward Flaschman
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Edward Flaschman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Feb 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. --Nkrosse (talk) 20:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
The recent edit you made to Edward Flaschman constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 20:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Edward Flaschman. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 20:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)